The influence of cognitive factors on pathological gambling
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.6092/1828-6550/APMB.105.2.2017.OS2Mots-clés :
gambling, locus of control, decisionmaking, superstition and unrealistic optimismRésumé
The purpose of this study wasto examine the role of cognitive factors, such as superstition, locus of control, decision-making and unrealistic optimism,on gambling.Eighty-six subjects participated in this study. They were divided into four groups: non-players, social players, problem gamblers, and pathological gamblers. Groups were formed on the basis of South Oaks Gambling Screen Scale. Results showed that pathological gamblers group obtained a high superstition index. With reference to unrealistic optimism, gambler groupbelieved that they had a better chance of success compared to non-gamblers. They also showed a higher impulsivity index in decision making than non-gamblers. This study supports the idea that cognitive factors such as superstition, unrealistic optimism, impulsivity and external locus of control are involved in gambling.Références
Kassinove, J.I., 1998. Development of the gambling attitude scales: preliminary findings. J. Clin. Psycho,. 54 (6), 763-771.
Sarti, S. & Triventi, M. (2017). The role of social and cognitive factors in individual gambling: An empirical study on college students. Social Science Research, 62, 219-237.
Walker, M.B. (1992). The Psychology of Gambling. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
Lim, M. S. M., Bowden-Jones, H., Salinas, M., Price, J., Goodwin, G., Geddes, J., & Rogers, R. (2017). The experience of gambling problems in British professional footballers: A preliminary qualitative study. Addiction Research and Theory, 25(2), 129-138. DOI: 10.1080/16066359.2016.1212338.
Lavanco, G., Varveri, L. (2001). Il giocatore sociale. L’intervento di psicologia in comunità, In G. Lavanco, (Ed) psicologia del gioco d’azzardo. Prospettive psicodinamiche e sociali. McGraw-Hill, Milano.
Glicksohn, J., Zilberman, N., (2010). Gambling on individual differences in decision-making. Personality and Individual Differences 48, 557–562.
Joukhador J., Blaszczynski A., Maccallum F. (2004). Superstitious Beliefs in Gambling Among Problem and Non-Problem Gamblers: Preliminary Data. Journal of Gambling Studies, Vol. 20, No. 2, Summer 2004.
Ladouceur, R. (2005). Controlled Gambling for Pathological Gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, Vol. 21, No. 1, Spring 2005.
Ladoucer, R., Walker M. (1996). A cognitive perspective on gambling, in Salkovskis (Ed), Trends in cognitive and behavioural therapies, John Wiley & Sons, N. Y.
Henry, R. Lesieur, D., Sheila, B., & Blume, M. D. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A New Instrument for the Identification of Pathological Gamblers populations. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184-188.
Zakay, D. (1996). The relativity of unrealistic optimism. Acta Psycologica, 93, 121-131.
Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction, 97(5), 487-499. doi:DOI 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00015.x
Toneatto, T. (1999). Cognitive psychopathology of problem gamblers. Substance Use & Misuse 43, 1593–1604.
Glicksohn, J.,& Zilberman, N. (2010). Gambling on individual differences in decision-making. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 557–562.
St-Pierre, R. A., & Derevensky, J. L. (2016). Youth gambling behavior: Novel approaches to prevention and intervention. Current Addiction Report, 3, 157-165.
Vergura D. T., Daveri, F. & Luceri, B. (2010). Il vissuto del gioco d’azzardo tra credenze ed atteggiamenti. University of Parma Ed.
Moshki, M., Ghofranipour, F., Hajizadeh, E. & Azadfallah, P. (2007). Validity and reliability of the multidimensional health locus of control scale for college students. BMC Public Health, 7:195.
Téléchargements
Publié
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).