Exploring Non-Immersive VR in Language Education: Technical and Pedagogical Preliminary Insights from a French Learning Platform.

Authors

  • Paola Labadessa Political and Legal Sciences Department, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
  • Simone G Paratore Political and Legal Sciences Department, University of Messina, Messina, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13129/3035-062X/prnr-5329

Keywords:

Virtual Reality, Foreign Language Teaching, CEFR, Automated Speech Recognition (ASR), Gamification.

Abstract

Background: The application of Virtual Reality (VR) in the educational field, although consolidated in some sectors and consistent with constructivist and experiential models, remains marginal in the academic context and, in particular, in the integration into Foreign Language Teaching (FLT).

Objectives: The study proposes a critical reflection on the use of VR in teaching French, hypothesizing that immersive environments can favour the pragmatic use of the language and the development of communicative skills. The experimental objective is an ex ante evaluation of the VR platform ImmerseMe, in relation to the FAIR principles, and to the indicators for learning a foreign language according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) (levels A1-A2).

Materials and Methods: A beginner-level training unit, randomly selected from the ImmerseMe demo version, was analysed. Complex devices (HMD) were excluded, favoring accessible Non Immersive VR solutions. After a brief comparison with other platforms, ImmerseMe was evaluated according three directions: a technological and architectural analysis, a technical and pedagogical insight about its usage modes (Pronunciation, Typing, Spelling, Translation, Conversation AI), and its pedagogical coherence with the CEFR. A final overview about affective and cognitive reflects was also carried on.

Results: Significant potential in the development of pragmatic, sociolinguistic, lexical, and phonological skills emerges from the analysis, as well as beneficial effects at an emotional and cognitive level, and greater autonomy in the learning process. However, the emergence of critical issues related to accessibility, the rigidity of the ASR, the lack of personalized feedback, and the rigidity of the Conversation AI mode, which, although promising, needs development to guarantee authenticity and measurability, are noted.

Conclusion: ImmerseMe represents an evolutionary model for FLT, but its scientific validation depends on the ability to overcome technical and methodological limitations. The integration of VR requires conscious didactic design, scaffolding strategies, and qualitative and quantitative evaluation tools.

 

 

References

Anthony B., Kamaludin A., Romli A. et al. (2022), Blended Learning Adoption and Implementation in Higher Education, in A Theoretical and Systematic Review. Tech Know Learn, 27, 531 ff.

Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Companion volume with new descriptors. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages

Conole G. (2013), Designing for Learning in an Open World, Springer.

Cowie, N., & Alizadeh, M. (2025). Virtual Reality for Language Learning. ELT Journal. (Text available on the website https://academic.oup.com/eltj/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/elt/ccaf025/8186115)

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.

Garrison D. R., Anderson T. (2003), E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice, Routledge.

Guichon N. (2012), Vers l’intégration des TIC dans l’enseignement des langues, Paris: Didier.

Guichon N. (2012), L’apprentissage des langues médiatisé par les technologies (ALMT) – Étude d’un domaine de recherche émergeant à travers les publications de la revue Alsic, in Alsic, Apprentissage des Langues et Systèmes d’Information et de Communication, vol. 15-3. (Text available on the website: journals.openedition.org/alsic/2539).

Holmes W., Gardner J. (2019), Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning, Paperback.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1996), Cooperation in the classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

Jurafsky,D., Martin,J. H. (2023), Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition Pearson/Prentice Hall. Text available on the website: web.stanford.edu/~jurafsky/slp3/ed3book.pdf

Kapp, K. M. (2013). The gamification of learning and instruction fieldbook: Ideas into practice. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Krashen, S. D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. Torrance, CA: Laredo Publishing Company.

Levy M. (1997), Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Context and Conceptualization, Oxford University Press.

Ollivier C., Puren L. (2011), Le web 2.0 en classe de langue, Paris : Maison des langues.

Özgün, S., & Sadık, F. (2023). Implementation of VR Technologies in Language Learning Settings: A Systematic Literature Review. ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1413239.pdf

Palgrave. (Ed.). (2023). The Palgrave encyclopedia of computer-assisted language learning (1a ed.). Springer.

Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and knowledge: An essay on the relations between organic regulations and cognitive processes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–281.

Yan, L., & Lowell, J. (2025). The Evolution of Virtual Reality in Foreign Language Education. TechTrends. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11528-025-01086-w

Yudintseva, A. (2024). Low- and High-Immersive VR Modalities for Willingness to Communicate in ESL [Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto]. https://utoronto.scholaris.ca/bitstreams/88424f9a-4a08-4d79-86d1-4bcf87d43a2a/download

Yuste-Frias-J.-et-al (2023), L’apprentissage des langues à l’ère du numérique: quelques réflexions empiriques basées sur des projets pédagogiques, Peter Lang.

Whyte S. (2011), Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms. ReCAL, Sep 1.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025)

Section

Methodological Articles

License

Creative Commons License Articles and conference papers published in Preliminary Reports and Negative Results in Life Science and Humanities are distributed under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Correspondingly, authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).