Experiencing Place through Virtual Reality: A Geographical and Cognitive Perspective from the Case of Noto (Sicily)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13129/3035-062X/prnr-5326Keywords:
Cognitive geography, Embodied perception, Immersive technologies, Place experience, Virtual realityAbstract
Background: The integration of immersive technologies into geographical research opens new epistemological and methodological perspectives on how places are perceived, represented, and experienced. This study explores the intersection between human geography and cognitive science through the use of virtual reality (VR) as a medium for spatial experience and territorial interpretation.
Methods: The research adopts a qualitative and exploratory approach centered on the pilot project “Noto in Virtual Reality”, developed at the University of Messina (COSPECS Department). The project consists of a virtual tour of the Modica di San Giovanni Winery in Noto, Sicily, reconstructed through a combination of 360° photographs and 3D scans implemented in Unreal Engine. It should be emphasized, however, that the simulation encompasses not only the winery, but also the surrounding area, providing a comprehensive view of the opportunities offered by the territory. Participants interact with the immersive environment via Meta Quest 3 headsets. The project is currently in its initial implementation phase and represents the first experimental application of the proposed model. The study draws upon theoretical frameworks from phenomenological geography (Tuan, 1977; Relph, 1976; Turri, 1998, 2014) and cognitive psychology to analyze the relationship between presence, sensory feedback, and spatial cognition.
Results: Preliminary observations indicate that virtual reality reproduces, within certain limits, the perceptual and emotional richness of physical space. The immersive experience elicits a strong sense of presence and engagement, suggesting a form of experiential realism where perception and territorial understanding converge. The project highlights the potential of VR as a tool for communicating enogastronomic landscapes and enhancing spatial awareness through multisensory interaction.
Conclusions: Virtual reality does not substitute real-world geography but extends it, offering a space for experimentation where perception, representation, and knowledge converge. When used critically, VR can serve as a cognitive and communicative device that makes the relational nature of place visible, supporting both academic research and local development strategies. The case of Noto illustrates how immersive technologies can strengthen the dialogue between geography and cognitive sciences, contributing to the renewal of geographical methodologies and the enhancement of territorial identities.
References
Ahmed, Z. U. (1996). The need for the identification of the constituents of a destination’s tourist image: A promotional segmentation perspective, The Tourist Review, 51(2), 44-57. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb058223
Ash, J., Kitchin, R., & Leszczynski, A. (2018). Digital turn, digital geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 42(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516664800
Bagnoli, L. (2014). Manuale di geografia del turismo. Dal grand tour ai sistemi turistici, Torino, UTET Università.
Baloglu, S., & Mangaloglu, M. (2001). Tourism destinations images of Turkey, Egypt, Greece, and Italy as perceived by US-based tour operators and travel agents, Tourism Management, 22(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(00)00030-3
Baloglu, S., & McCleary, K. W. (1999). US International pleasure travelers’ images of four Mediterranean destinations: A comparison of visitors and nonvisitors, Journal of Travel Research, 38(2), 144-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759903800207
Chen, J. S., & Uysal, M. (2002). Market positioning analysis: A hybrid approach, Annals of Tourism Research, 29(4), 987-1003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(02)00003-8
Compeau, L. D., Grewal, D., & Monroe, K. B. (1998). Role of prior affect and sensory cues on consumers’ affective and cognitive responses and overall perceptions of quality, Journal of Business Research, 42(3), 295-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963
Daniel, T. C. (2001). Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century, Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1-4), 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046
DeLanda, M. (2005). Space: Extensive and Intensive, Actual and Virtual, in Ian Buchanan, and Gregg Lambert (eds), Deleuze and Space (Edinburh, 2005; online edn, Edinburgh Scholarship Online, 20 Sept. 2012). https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748618743.003.0005
Dematteis, G. (1985). Le metafore della Terra. La geografia umana tra mito e scienza. Milano, Italy: Feltrinelli.
Farinelli, F. (1991). L’arguzia del paesaggio, Casabella, 575-576, 10-12.
Farinelli, F. (2015). La capriola del paesaggio, in A. Voghera & B. Zanon (Eds.), Quindici anni dopo la Convenzione Europea del Paesaggio 2000-2015, Sentieri urbani, 17, 18-22.
Finke, R. A. (1986). Mental Imagery and the Visual System, Scientific American, 254(3), 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0386-88
Gaggioli, A. & Breining, R. (2001). Perception and cognition in immersive virtual reality, in Communications through virtual technologies: identity, community and technology in the communication age, Amsterdam, IOS Press, pp. 71-86.
Gartner, W. C. (1993). Image formation process, Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 2(2/3), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1300/J073v02n02_12
Gibson, J. J. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception, Classic ed., New York, Psychology Press.
Guttentag, D. A. (2010). Virtual reality: Applications and implications for tourism. Tourism Management, 31(5), 637–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.07.003
Hunt, J. D. (1975). Image as a factor in tourism development, Journal of Travel Research, 13, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728757501300301
Ingold, T. (2001). Ecologia della cultura, Roma, Meltemi.
Joppe, M., Martin, D. W. & Waalen, J. (2001). Toronto’s image as a destination: A comparative importance-satisfaction analysis by origin of visitor, Journal of Travel Research, 39(3), 252-260. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728750103900302
Krishna, A. (2012). An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgment and behavior, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 332-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.08.003
Lefebvre, H. (1974). La production de l’espace. Paris, France: Anthropos.
Leisen, B. (2001). Image segmentation: The case of a tourism destination, Journal of Services Marketing, 15(1), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040110381517
Lothian, A. (1999). Landscape and the philosophy of aestetichs: is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder?, Landscape and Urban Planning, 44(1), 177-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046
Malvica, S. (2024). Maptelling e smart tourism. Esperimenti di fruizione turistica, Genzano di Roma, Aracne.
Malvica, S., Nicosia, E., & Porto, C. M. (2023). Is the projected landscape also perceived? A proposed research plan on Etna Park’s conflicting destination image. AIMS Geosciences, 9(4), 783–797. https://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/geosci.2023042
Massey, D. (1994). Space, Place and Gender. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1969). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris, France: Gallimard.
Moloney, J., Spehar, B., Globa, A., & Wang, R. (2018). The affordance of virtual reality to enable the sensory representation of multi-dimensional data for immersive analytics: from experience to insight, J Big Data 5, 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-018-0158-z
Nghiêm-Phú, B. (2017). Sensory marketing in an outdoor out-store shopping environment – an exploratory study in Japan, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 29(5), 994-1016. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-09-2016-0178
Nghiêm-Phú, B., & Bagul, A. (2020). An extended model of destination image formation: The inclusion of sensory image, European of Tourism Research, 24, 2411. https://doi.org/10.54055/ejtr.v24i.413
Parisi, F. (2018). Fotografie e scienze della mente. Scenari possibili, In: E. Menduni & L. Marmo (Eds.), Fotografia e culture visuali del XXI secolo, pp. 85-92, TrEPress.
Penz, F., Radick, G., & Howell, R. (2004). Space, In Science, Art and Society, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Pizzolante, M., Bartolotta, S., Sarcinella, E. D., Chirico, A. & Gaggioli, A. (2024). Virtual vs. real: exploring perceptual, cognitive and affective dimensions in design product experiences, BMC Psychology, 12(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01497-5
Raffestin, C. (2019). Pour une géographie du pouvoir (A.-L. Amilhat Szary & Y. Calbérac, Éds.; 1ʳᵉ éd.). Lyon, France: ENS Éditions.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London, UK: Pion.
Riva, G., & Mantovani, F. (2012). From the body to the tools and back: A general framework for presence in mediated interactions. Interacting with Computers, 24(4), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2012.04.007
San Martín, H., & Rodríguez del Bosque, I. A. (2008). Exploring the cognitive-affective nature of destination image and the role of psychological factors in its formation, Tourism Management, 29(2), 263-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.03.012
Shams, L., & Seitz, A. R. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 411-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.006
Slater, M. (2003). A note on presence terminology, Presence Connect, 3(3), 1-5.
Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Turri, E. (1998). Il paesaggio come teatro. Venezia, Italy: Marsilio.
Turri, E. (2014). Semiologia del paesaggio italiano. Venezia, Italy: Marsilio.
U.N. Statistical Book (1980). United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistical Yearbook 1978 – Thirtieth Issue, United Nations. https://doi.org/10.18356/5dadf2e8-en-fr
Vincenti, G. (2019). Percezione e rappresentazione dello spazio nel contesto applicativo del territorio appenninico. In Atti del XXXII Congresso Geografico Italiano (pp. 1573–1581). Roma, Italy: AGeI.
Wei, Z., Liao, J., Lee, L. H., Qu, H., & Xu, X. (2025). Towards Enhanced Learning through Presence: A Systematics Review of Presence in Virtual Reality Across Tasks and Disciplines, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13845. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.13845
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Articles and conference papers published in Preliminary Reports and Negative Results in Life Science and Humanities are distributed under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Correspondingly, authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
