“Sehnsucht” (nostalgia): anatomia di un concetto nella Teoria critica di Max Horkheimer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7413/2281813819608Parole chiave:
Horkheimer, Sehnsucht (nostalgia), Teoria Critica, Pessimismo, ReligioneAbstract
“Sehnsucht” (Nostalgia): anatomy of a concept in Max Horkheimer’s Critical Theory.
The aim of this contribution is to analyze the theme of nostalgia (“Sehnsucht”) in the work of Max Horkheimer (1895-1973). This theme refers not only to a personal emotional state (“Stimmung”) but also serves as a lens for understanding both our era and the course of the world from a sociocultural perspective. In a broad analysis, nostalgia emerges as a defining feature of Horkheimer’s contributions to Critical Theory. It transcends mere occurrence and acts as an underlying sentiment that permeates all his analyses, from his early writings to his later works. Through a careful examination of Horkheimer’s texts (both published and unpublished) as well as secondary scholarly literature on the author, this essay aims to offer a particular interpretation of Critical Theory. In addressing thinkers like Paul Tillich and through a renewed engagement with Arthur Schopenhauer - referred to as Horkheimer’s Schopenhauer-Marxismus (Wiggershaus) - the Frankfurt School emphasizes the necessity for sociologists to adopt a “disenchanted” and “disillusioned” perspective. This viewpoint emerges against the backdrop of a dialogue among the sociological, theological, and ethical-political spheres, which has gained considerable interest in the latest generation of Critical Theory.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Alexander J. (2003), The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Alexander J. (2018), Trauma. La rappresentazione sociale del dolore, Milano, Meltemi.
Benjamin W. (1997), Sul concetto di storia, Torino, Einaudi.
Chung V., Grèzes J., Pacherie E. (2024), “Collective Emotion: A Framework for Experimental Research”, Emotion Review, 16(1): 28-45.
Forst R. (2023), The rule of unreason. Analyzing (anti-)democratic regression, Constellations, 1: 1-8.
Jaeggi R. (2022), Fortschritt und Regression, Berlin, Suhrkamp.
Joas H. (2010), Abbiamo bisogno della religione? Soveria Mannelli, Rubbettino.
Joas H. (2024), Under the Spell of Freedom. Theory of Religion after Hegel and Nietzsche, New York, Oxford University Press.
Johannssen D. (2019), “Toward a Negative Anthropology”, Anthropology & Materialism, 1, Online since 15 October 2013, connection on 30 April 2019.
Horkheimer M. (1973), “Es geht um die Moral der Deutschen”, Der Spiegel, n. 29 del 15 luglio 1973 https://www.spiegel.de/kultur/es-geht-um-die-moral-der-deutschen-a-31acebd3-0002-0001-0000-000041955111
Horkheimer M. (1977) Crepuscolo. Appunti presi in Germania (1926-1931), Torino, Einaudi.
Horkheimer M. (1985a), Aus der Pubertät. Novellen und Tagebuchblätter 1914-1918, GS 1, Frankfurt am Main, Fischer Verlag.
Horkheimer M. (1985b), Religion und Philosophie (1965), in Vorträge und Aufzeichnungen 1949 – 1973, GS VIII, Frankfurt am Main, Fischer Verlag: 187-196.
Horkheimer M. (1988), Gesammelte Schriften: Nachgelassene Schriften 1949–1972, GS XIV, Frankfurt am Main, Fischer Verlag.
Horkheimer M. (2005), “Teoria critica ieri e oggi”, in Donaggio E. (a cura di), La Scuola di Francoforte. La storia e i testi, Torino, Einaudi: 370-386.
Horkheimer M. (2014), Teoria critica, 2 voll., Milano-Udine: Mimesis.
Horkheimer M. (2019), La Nostalgia del Totalmente Altro, Brescia, Queriniana.
Ketterer H., Becker K. (a cura di) (2019), Was stimmt nicht mit der Demokratie Eine Debatte mit Klaus Dörre, Nancy Fraser, Stephan Lessenich und Hartmut Rosa, Berlin, Suhrkamp.
Laux H., Rosa H. (2009), Die beschleunigte Demokratie – Überlegungen zur Weltwirtschaftskrise, WSI Mitteilungen 10/2009 https://www.wsi.de/data/wsimit_2009_10_laux.pdf
Ott R.M. (1998), Max Horkheimer’s Critical Theory of Religion:The Meaning of Religion in the Struggle for Human Emancipation. Western Michigan University. Dissertations (n. 1579) https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/1579
Rosa H. (2015), Accelerazione e alienazione. Per una Teoria critica del tempo nella tarda modernità, Torino, Einaudi.
Rosa H. (2016), Resonanz. Eine Soziologie der Weltbezieungen, Berlin, Suhrkamp.
Rosa H. (2019), “Über die Schwierigkeit, Fundamente im Treibsand zu bauen. Beschleunigungstheoretische Überlegungen zum Verhältnis von Recht und Demokratie”, in Fröhlich M., Lembcke O., Weber-Stein F. (a cura di), Universitas. Ideen, Individuen und Institutionen in Politik und Wissenschaft (Festschrift für Klaus Dicke), Baden-Baden, NOMOS: 313-334.
Rosa H. (2022), Demokratie braucht Religion, München, Kösel.
Rosa H. (2024), Indisponibilità. All’origine della risonanza, Brescia, Queriniana.
Ruggieri D. (2020). “The Unpublished Correspondence between Hans Simmel and Max Horkheimer (1936–1943). Some Remarks on Critical Theory, Georg Simmel’s Sociology, and the Tasks of the Institute for Social Research”, Simmel Studies, vol. 24/1, pp. 127-158.
Ruggieri D. (2023) “Normative Reciprocity, Relational Sociology, and the Critique of Forms of Social Life”, in Hałas E. (a cura di), Methodology of Relational Sociology. Palgrave Studies in Relational Sociology, Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 295-315.
von Scheve C., Salmella M. (a cura di) (2014), Collective Emotions: Perspectives from psychology, philosophy, and sociology, New York, Oxford University Press.
Shaw B.J. (1985), “Reason, Nostalgia, and Eschatology in the Critical Theory of Max Horkheimer”, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 47(1): 160-181
Siebert R.J. (1977), “The new religious dimension in Western Marxism: II”, Horizons, 4 (fasc. 1): 43–59 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0360966900013736
Siebert R.J. (2002), “Christianity As Absolute or Relative Religion: From Hegel To Horkheimer, Benjamin, Adorno And Habermas”, Hegel-Jahrbuch, 4, fasc. JG: 108–30 https://doi.org/10.1524/hgjb.202.4.jg.108
Siebert R.J. (2005), “The critical theory of society: The longing for the totally other”, Critical Sociology, 31 (fasc. 1–2): 57–113 https://doi.org/10.1163/1569163053084270
Thonhauser G. (2024), Collective emotions and the distributed emotion framework, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-024-09965-y
Varman E. (2023), “Birth, Sehnsucht and Creation: Reading Buber between Plato and Kierkegaard”, Religions, 14(16) https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14010016
Zanghi D. (2023), Compassione e rivolta. Lo schopenhauerismo controcorrente del giovane Horkheimer nei testi di Aus der Pubertät, Roma, Castelvecchi.
Zhang R., Voronov M., Toubiana M., Vince R., Hudson B.A. (2024), “Beyond the Feeling Individual: Insights from Sociology on Emotions and Embeddedness”, Journal of Management Studies, 61: 2212-2250. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12976
Dowloads
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
