Shaping Preferences Through Memory: Aged-Related Mechanisms in Dissonance Reduction

Authors

  • Maria Laura Reale Neuropsychology Lab, Department of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo
  • Patrizia Turriziani Neuropsychology Lab, Department of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo
  • Massimiliano Oliveri Neuropsychology Lab, Department of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo
  • Renata Mangano Neuropsychology Lab, Department of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13129/3035-062X/prnr-4650

Keywords:

Choice-induced attitude change, cognitive dissonance, episodic memory, recognition memory, aging

Abstract

Preference change is a robust phenomenon observed in internally guided decision-making situations.

Choice-induced preference change, in particular, occurs when individuals revise their preferences to align with their choices, reducing cognitive dissonance—a psychological state of discomfort arising from conflicting cognitions. Episodic memory has been suggested to play a role in this process, by helping recall choice-relevant information that reinforces post-choice preferences. However, age-related declines in memory may weaken this mechanism, leading to diminished preference adjustments in older adults.

This study explored the relationship between episodic memory and choice-induced preference change in young and older adults. A sample of 33 healthy subjects aged 20-75 years underwent an adapted free-choice paradigm that included a recognition memory test for the choice made. Our results showed that younger participants exhibited significant preference changes in both overall and remembered choices, whereas older participants showed no such adjustments.

These findings suggest that episodic memory supports choice-induced preference change in younger adults. In contrast, other mechanisms susceptible to aging may underlie dissonance reduction in older adults such as executive functions and/or emotional-affective factors.

References

Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. Successful aging, 1-34.

Brehm, J. W. (1956). Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52(3), 384.

Carstensen, L. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312(5782), 1913-1915.

Chammat, M., Karoui, I. E., Allali, S., Hagège, J., Lehongre, K., Hasboun, D., ... & Naccache, L. (2017). Cognitive dissonance resolution depends on episodic memory. Scientific reports, 7(1), 41320.

Chen, M. K., & Risen, J. L. (2010). How choice affects and reflects preferences: revisiting the free-choice paradigm. Journal of personality and social psychology, 99(4), 573.

Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Festinger, L., & Walster, E. (1964). Post-decision regret and decision reversal. Conflict, decision, and dissonance, 100-12.

Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of psychiatric research, 12(3), 189-198.

Heckhausen, J., Wrosch, C., & Schulz, R. (2010). A motivational theory of life-span development. Psychological review, 117(1), 32.

Huang, Y., Li, M., & Yu, R. (2023). Choice reminder modulates choice-induced preference change in elderly adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 78(1), 73-81.

Ito, A., Kawachi, Y., Kawasaki, I., & Fujii, T. (2019). Effect of aging on choice-induced cognitive conflict. Behavioural brain research, 363, 94-102.

Izuma, K., & Murayama, K. (2013). Choice-induced preference change in the free-choice paradigm: a critical methodological review. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 41.

Labouvie‐Vief, G., Grühn, D., & Studer, J. (2010). Dynamic integration of emotion and cognition: Equilibrium regulation in development and aging. The handbook of life‐span development. Vol. 2, 79–115

Lieberman, M. D., Ochsner, K. N., Gilbert, D. T., & Schacter, D. L. (2001). Do amnesics exhibit cognitive dissonance reduction? The role of explicit memory and attention in attitude change. Psychological science, 12(2), 135-140.

Mengarelli, F., Spoglianti, S., Avenanti, A., & di Pellegrino, G. (2015). Cathodal tDCS over the left prefrontal cortex diminishes choice-induced preference change. Cerebral Cortex, 25(5), 1219-1227.

Salti, M., El Karoui, I., Maillet, M., & Naccache, L. (2014). Cognitive dissonance resolution is related to episodic memory. PloS one, 9(9), e108579.

Västfjäll, D., Peters, E., & Bjälkebring, P. (2011). The experience and regulation of regret across the adult life span. Emotion regulation and well-being, 165-180.

Voigt, K., Murawski, C., Speer, S., & Bode, S. (2019). Hard decisions shape the neural coding of preferences. Journal of Neuroscience, 39(4), 718-726.

Wicklund, R. A., & Brehm, J. W. (2013). Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. Psychology Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024)

Section

Original Articles

License

Creative Commons License Articles and conference papers published in Preliminary Reports and Negative Results in Life Science and Humanities are distributed under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Correspondingly, authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).