Interoceptive awareness does not predict political orientation: Evidence from Italian Voters
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13129/3035-062X/prnr-4219Keywords:
Interoceptive awareness, MAIA-2, political orientation, negative resultsAbstract
Research exploring a link between political ideology and interoception has produced contrasting results. We administered the Multi-Dimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA-2) to a sample of Italian individuals to provide further insight into the field. Our results do not support the existence of a link between political ideology and interoception. These findings contribute to the current debate on the predictive role of interoception in political orientation.
References
Brown, H., Proulx, M. J., & Stanton Fraser, D. (2020). Hunger bias or gut instinct? responses to judgments of harm depending on visceral state versus intuitive decision-making. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2261.
Carlisle, M. (2019). What to Know About the Origins of’Left’and’Right’in Politics, From the French Revolution to the 2020 Presidential Race. Time, September, 14.
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1999). Personality profiles and political parties. Political psychology, 20(1), 175-197.
Caprara, G. V., Schwartz, S., Capanna, C., Vecchione, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political psychology, 27(1), 1-28.
Cazzato, V., Vicario, C. M., & Urgesi, C. (2022). ‘When hunger makes everything better looking!’: The effect of hunger on the aesthetic appreciation of human bodies, faces and objects. BMC psychology, 10(1), 1-13.
Garfinkel, S. N., Seth, A. K., Barrett, A. B., Suzuki, K., & Critchley, H. D. (2015). Knowing your own heart: distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness. Biological psychology, 104, 65-74.
Grynberg, D., & Pollatos, O. (2015). Perceiving one's body shapes empathy. Physiology & behavior, 140, 54-60.
Kerry, N., Loria, R. N., & Murray, D. R. (2019). Gluttons for punishment? Experimentally induced hunger unexpectedly reduces harshness of suggested punishments. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 5, 352-370.
Mehling, W. E., Price, C., Daubenmier, J. J., Acree, M., Bartmess, E., & Stewart, A. (2012). The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA). PloS one, 7(11), e48230.
Palmer, C. E., & Tsakiris, M. (2018). Going at the heart of social cognition: is there a role for interoception in self-other distinction?. Current opinion in psychology, 24, 21-26.
Piech, R. M., Strelchuk, D., Knights, J., Hjälmheden, J. V., Olofsson, J. K., & Aspell, J. E. (2017). People with higher interoceptive sensitivity are more altruistic, but improving interoception does not increase altruism. Scientific reports, 7(1), 15652.
Ruisch, B. C., Von Mohr, M., Naber, M., Tsakiris, M., Fazio, R. H., & Scheepers, D. T. (2022). Sensitive liberals and unfeeling conservatives? Interoceptive sensitivity predicts political liberalism. Politics and the Life Sciences, 41(2), 256-275.
Smith, K.B., Oxley, D., Hibbing, M.V., Alford, J.R., & Hibbing, J.R. (2011). Disgust sensitivity and the neurophysiology of left-right political orientations. PLoS One, 6(10), e25552.
Tian, H. H., Aziz, A. R., Png, W., Wahid, M. F., & Yeo, D. (2011). Constance Png AL. Effects of fasting during ramadan month on cognitive function in muslim athletes. Asian Journal of Sports Medicine, 2, 145–153.
Vicario, C. M., Nitsche, M. A., Salehinejad, M. A., Avanzino, L., & Martino, G. (2020). Time processing, interoception, and insula activation: a mini-review on clinical disorders. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 1893.
Vicario, C. M., Kuran, K. A., Rogers, R., & Rafal, R. D. (2018). The effect of hunger and satiety in the judgment of ethical violations. Brain and cognition, 125, 32-36.
Vicario, C. M., Kuran, K. A., & Urgesi, C. (2019). Does hunger sharpen senses? A psychophysics investigation on the effects of appetite in the timing of reinforcement-oriented actions. Psychological research, 83, 395-405.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Articles and conference papers published in Preliminary Reports and Negative Results in Life Science and Humanities are distributed under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Correspondingly, authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).