The process of latency in current clinical: study through projective methods (Rorschach and T.A.T.).

Authors

  • Tiziana Sola University of Chieti
  • Carmela Mento Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina
  • Mariantonietta Gennari
  • Silvia Marfisi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/2282-1619/2013.2.920

Keywords:

Process of latency, Childs, Projective methods

Abstract

 Our research, based on the contribution of projective methods, by Rorschach Test and the Thematic Apperception Test, should bring us data rather disturbing in so-called normal latencies, particularly in the cohesion of self, organizing drives, the dynamism between phantasy and sense of reality and effectiveness of sinks, allowing us to reflect on the quality of the processes of differentiation and the operation of the transitional spaces, or transformative of the child.

 

References

Boekholt M. (1993), Epreuves thématiques en clinique infantile, Dunod, Paris. Bonaminio V., Di Renzo M. (2001), Figurazioni della latenza, Richard e Piggle, 9, 2, 156-171. Carratelli T., Lanza A. M., Ardizzone I. (2001), Le vicissitudini del sé in latenza tra mondo interno e mondo esterno, Richard e Piggle, 9, 141-155. Chagnon J.-Y. (2001) L’enfant de dix ans face aux épreuves projectives, Psychologie Clinique et Projective, Vol. 7, 175-198. Chagnon J.-Y. (2009), La période de latence, en ouvrage coll., sous la dir. de Marty F., Les grandes problématiques de la psychologie clinique, Paris, Dunod. Denis P. (2003), Quelle latence pour les enfants d’aujourd’hui ?, Neuropsychiatrie de l’enfance et de l’adolescence, vol. 51, n° 6, 288-291. Freud S. (1905), Tre saggi sulla teoria sessuale (trois essais sur la théorie sexuelle), OSF, vol. 4, Boringhieri, Torino 1970. Freud. S. (1924), Il tramonto del conflitto edipico (Le déclin du conflit œdipien), OSF, vol. 10. Boringhieri, Torino 1978. Freud S. (1925), Alcune conseguenze psichiche della differenza anatomica dei sessi (Quelques conséquences psychiques de la différence anatomique entre les sexes), OSF, vol. 10, Boringhieri, Torino 1978. Fréjaville A. (2002), Oedipe, ses complexes et notre époque, Revue Française de Psychanalyse, n° 1-2002, 129-144. Fréjaville A. (2003), Le triangle oedipien dans la tourmente, Neuropsychiatrie de l’enfance et de l’adolescence, vol. 51, n° 3, 129-136. Guignard F. (2010), Réflexions d’une psychanalyste sur l’enfant dans la société occidentale d’aujourd’hui, Le Carnet Psy, 144, 39-45. Guignard F. (2007), Œdipe aujourd’hui et demain ? in Cabrol G., Nayrou F., Parat H. (2007) Actualité de l’Œdipe, PUF, Paris, 116-137. Jeammet P., Corcos M. (2005), Evolution des problématiques à l’adolescence. L’émergence de la dépendance et ses aménagements, Rueil-Malmaison, Doin, 2ème édition. Lazartigues A. (2000), A nouvelles familles, nouveaux enfants ?, Neuropsychiatrie de l’enfance et de l’adolescence, vol. 48, n° 1, 32-43. Lazartigues A. (2001), La famille contemporaine « fait »-elle de nouveaux enfants ?, Neuropsychiatrie de l’enfance et de l’adolescence, vol. 49, n° 4, 264-276. Nayrou F. (2006), La transmission des interdits et son échec dans l’anomie de la déliaison sociale, in Durieux M. C., Nayrou F., Parat H. (2006), Interdit et tabou, Paris, PUF, Monographies et débats de psychanalyse, 71-105. Novick K.K. e Novick J. (1994), Postoedipal transformation: latency, adolescence and pathogenesis, J. Am. Psychoanal. Association, 42, 1994, 143-169. Raush de Traubenberg N., Boizu M.-F. (1984), Le Rorschach en clinique infantile, Dunod, Paris. Sabatini Scalmati A. (2010), La costruzione dell’immagine di sé nella latenza, in Lugones M. e Bisagni F. (2010) Bambine e bambini. Quale latenza oggi?, Quaderni di Psicoterapia infantile, 60, Borla, Roma, 166-182. Sapio M. (2010), Movimenti e impedimenti di latenza: angolature, in Lugones M. e Bisagni F. (2010) Bambine e bambini. Quale latenza oggi?, Quaderni di Psicoterapia infantile, 60, Borla, Roma, 148-165.

Downloads

Published

19-09-2013

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2013)

Section

Projective Methods

License

Creative Commons License Articles and conference papers published in Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology are distributed under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Correspondingly, authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).