Structural validity and measurement invariance of the Brief Positive and Negative Affect Scale in emerging adulthood across countries and between women and men
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13129/2282-1619/mjcp-5101Keywords:
Clinical psychology, Cross-cultural, Measurement invariance, positive and negative affect, subjective well-being, Young adultsAbstract
Introduction: Emerging adulthood (ages 18–29) is a key period of emotional and social development, and cross-cultural research is essential to understanding how these processes manifest in diverse Latin American contexts. Given the need for brief, culturally valid tools to assess affect during this stage, this study focuses on the validation of the 10-item Positive and Negative Affect Scale in emerging adults from Chile and Ecuador and evaluate its measurement invariance across country and sex groups.
Methods: A psychometric cross-sectional design was used to assess a sample of 1693 emerging adults (61.7% women) aged 18-29 years (M = 21.94, SD = 2.81). The sample included 983 participants from Chile (M = 22.52, SD = 2.57) and 710 from Ecuador (M = 21.13, SD = 2.94).
Results: The results indicate that the Positive and Negative Affect Scale demonstrates adequate structural validity in both countries and both sexes. Strict invariance was achieved across Chile and Ecuador, as well as by sex, supporting the comparability of scores across groups. Regarding latent means, Chilean participants reported lower levels of both positive and negative affect compared to their Ecuadorian counterparts. Additionally, men reported higher levels of positive affect, whereas women reported higher levels of negative affect.
Conclusions: The findings are consistent with theoretical models of subjective well-being that conceptualize positive and negative affect as related but distinct dimensions. Although the results cannot be directly generalized to clinical or public health settings, they suggest that the Brief Positive and Negative Affect Scale may serve as a brief tool for assessing affect in both research and applied contexts, including initial screening and large-scale assessments. However, the use of non-probabilistic sampling may limit generalizability, and future studies should include more diverse populations and longitudinal designs to further examine the robustness of these findings.
References
Arancibia, H. (2019). Validation of the positive and negative affect scale in the Chilean population and its application on migrant people. Medwave, 19(01), e7579–e7579. https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2019.01.7579
Arnett, J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
Arnett, J. (2004). Adolescence and emerging adulthood: A cultural approach (2nd (ed.)). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson.
Arnett, J. (2007). Emerging adulthood: What is it, and what is it good for? Child Development Perspectives, 1(2), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2007.00016.x
Arnett, J. (2024). Emerging adulthood. Oxford University Press New York. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197695937.001.0001
Arnett, J., & Mitra, D. (2020). Are the features of Emerging Adulthood developmentally distinctive? A Comparison of Ages 18–60 in the United States. Emerging Adulthood, 8(5), 412–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696818810073
Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Three-step approaches using M Plus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.915181
Ato, M., López-García, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). A classification system for research designs in psychology. Anales de Psicología, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511
Baghdarnia, M., Soreh, R. F., & Gorji, R. (2014). The comparison of two methods of maximum likelihood (ML) and diagonally weighted least squares (DWLS) in testing construct validity of achievement goals. Journal of Educational and Management Studies, 4(1), 22-38.
Baptista, T., Vargas, O., Colmenares, R., & Piñero, J. (2020). Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): psychometric properties of a Venezuelan Spanish version in medical students. Investigación Clínica, 61(4), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.22209/IC.v61n4a01
Batz, C., & Tay, L. (2018). Gender differences in subjective well-being. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of well-being. DEF Publishers.
Batz-Barbarich, C., Tay, L., Kuykendall, L., & Cheung, H. K. (2018). A meta-analysis of gender differences in subjective well-being: Estimating effect sizes and associations with gender inequality. Psychological Science, 29(9), 1491–1503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618774796
Blanchflower, D., & Bryson, A. (2024). The gender well-being gap. Social Indicators Research, 173(3), 1-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-024-03334-7
Botha, F., Morris, R. W., Butterworth, P., & Glozier, N. (2023). Generational differences in mental health trends in the twenty-first century. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(49), e2303781120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2303781120
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guilford Publications.
Buecker, S., Luhmann, M., Haehner, P., Bühler, J. L., Dapp, L. C., Luciano, E. C., & Orth, U. (2023). The development of subjective well-being across the life span: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 149(7–8), 418–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000401
Byrne, B. (2008). Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: A walk through the process. Psicothema, 20(4), 872–882.
Chaplin, T. M. (2015). Gender and emotion expression: A developmental contextual perspective. Emotion Review, 7(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914544408
Chen, F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
Chen, L., Wu, K., Du, H., King, R. B., Chen, A., Li, T., & Chi, P. (2023). Less equal, less satisfied? Gender inequality hampers adults’ subjective well-being via gender-role attitudes. Sex Roles, 89(11–12), 718–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01392-8
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2019). Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1412. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000626
Cleveland, M. J., & Goldstein, A. L. (2019). Opportunities and challenges for prevention and intervention in emerging adulthood: Introduction to the special issue. Prevention Science, 20(3), 301-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-0976-z
Díaz-García, A., González-Robles, A., Mor, S., Mira, A., Quero, S., García-Palacios, A., Baños, R. M., & Botella, C. (2020). Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Psychometric properties of the online Spanish version in a clinical sample with emotional disorders. BMC Psychiatry, 20(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-2472-1
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2018). Advances and open questions in the science of subjective well-being. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 1–78. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.115
Dufey, M., & Fernandez, A. M. (2012). Validez y confiabilidad del Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) en estudiantes universitarios chilenos [Validity and reliability of the Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in Chilean college students]. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación - e Avaliação Psicológica, 2(3), 157–173.
Flores, P., & Medrano, L. (2016). El afecto y sus dimensiones: contrastes de modelos ortogonales y oblicuos mediante análisis factorial confirmatorio de la escala panas [Affection and its dimensions: Contrast of orthogonal and oblique models through confirmatory factor analysis of panas schedule]. LIBERABIT, 22(2), 173–184.
Flores, P., & Medrano, L. (2018). Comparación de dos versiones reducidas de la Escala PANAS: Análisis factoriales en una muestra Argentina [Comparison of two short-forms of the PANAS: Factor analysis in a Argentine sample]. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación - e Avaliação Psicológica, 4(49), 37–46.
Flores‐Kanter, P. E., Garrido, L. E., Moretti, L. S., & Medrano, L. A. (2021). A modern network approach to revisiting the Positive and Negative Affective Schedule (PANAS) construct validity. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 77(10), 2370-2404. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23191
García, F., & Arias, P. (2019). Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Afecto Positivo y Negativo en población Ecuatoriana [Psychometric properties of Positive and Negative Affect Schedule in Ecuadorian population]. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 36(1), 55–62.
Gargurevich, R., & Matos, L. (2012). Validez y confiabilidad de escala de afecto positivo y negativo (SPANAS) en estudiantes universitarios Peruanos [Validity and reliability of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (SPANAS) in university Peruvian students]. Revista de Psicología, 14(2), 208–217.
Haring, M. J., Stock, W. A., & Okun, M. A. (1984). A research synthesis of gender and social class as correlates of subjective well-being. Human Relations, 37(8), 645–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678403700805
Heine, S. J., & Raineri, A. (2009). Self-improving motivations and collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(1), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022108326193
Helliwell, J., Layard, R., Sachs, J., De Neve, J., Aknin, L., & Wang, S. (2024). World happiness report 2024. University of Oxford: Wellbeing Research Centre. http://doi.org/10.18724/whr-kk3m-b586
Holtmann, J., Koch, T., Lochner, K., & Eid, M. (2016). A comparison of ML, WLSMV, and Bayesian Methods for multilevel structural equation models in small samples: A simulation study. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(5), 661–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2016.1208074
Joshanloo, M., & Jovanović, V. (2020). The relationship between gender and life satisfaction: analysis across demographic groups and global regions. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 23(3), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-019-00998-w
Joshi, U. (2010). Subjective well-being by gender. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 1(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v1i1.211
Krys, K., Vignoles, V. L., de Almeida, I., & Uchida, Y. (2022). Outside the “Cultural Binary”: understanding why Latin American collectivist societies foster independent selves. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(4), 1166–1187. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211029632
Larco, S. S., Romo, M. G., Garcés, M. S., & Koopmann-Holm, B. (2024). People in Ecuador and the United States conceptualize compassion differently: The role of avoided negative affect. Emotion, 24(6), 1456–1467. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001356
Larsen, R. (2009). The contributions of positive and negative affect to emotional well-being. Psychological Topics, 2, 247–266.
Leue, A., & Beauducel, A. (2011). The PANAS structure revisited: on the validity of a bifactor model in community and forensic samples. Psychological Assessment, 23(1), 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021400
Leue, A., & Lange, S. (2011). Reliability generalization: An examination of the positive affect and negative affect schedule. Assessment, 18(4), 487-501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191110374917
Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519. https://doi.org/10.2307/2334770
McDonald, R. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal Of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 568–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568
Minkov, M. (2018). A revision of Hofstede’s model of national culture: old evidence and new data from 56 countries. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 25(2), 231–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-03-2017-0033
Moreta-Herrera, R., Perdomo-Pérez, M., Reyes-Valenzuela, C., Torres-Salazar, C., & Ramírez-Iglesias, G. (2021). Invarianza factorial según nacionalidad y fiabilidad de la Escala de Afecto Positivo y Negativo (PANAS) en universitarios de Colombia y Ecuador [Factor invariance and reliability of Positive and Negative Affect Schedules (PANAS) in university students in Colombia and Ecuador]. Anuario de Psicología/The UB Journal of Psychology, 51(2). https://doi.org/10.1344/anpsic2021.51.9
Nunes, L. Y. O., Lemos, D. C. L., Ribas, R. de C. J., Behar, C. B., & Pedro P. P. (2019). Análisis psicométrico de la PANAS en Brasil. Ciencias Psicológicas, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v13i1.1808
Parra-Gaete, C., Vinueza, A., & Bourgeat-Salazar, M. (2025). Measurement invariance and differential item functioning of the positive and negative affect schedule: a psychometric study in Ecuadorian young adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1635726. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1635726
Perry, N. L. (2020). Gender differences in subjective well‐being. In The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 191–194). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119547174.ch209
Petersen, I. T., Lindhiem, O., LeBeau, B., Bates, J. E., Pettit, G. S., Lansford, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (2018). Development of internalizing problems from adolescence to emerging adulthood: Accounting for heterotypic continuity with vertical scaling. Developmental Psychology, 54(3), 586–599. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000449
Pinquart, M., & Sorensen, S. (2001). Gender differences in self-concept and psychological well-being in old age: A meta-analysis. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 56(4), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/56.4.P195
Quirin, M., Wróbel, M., Norcini Pala, A., Stieger, S., Brosschot, J., Kazén, M., Hicks, J. A., Mitina, O., Shanchuan, D., Lasauskaite, R., Silvestrini, N., Steca, P., Padun, M. A., & Kuhl, J. (2018). A cross-cultural validation of the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 34(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000315
R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org/
Robles, R., & Páez, F. (2003). Estudio sobre la traducción al español y las propiedades psicométricas de las escalas de afecto positivo y negativo (PANAS). Salud Mental, 26(1), 69–75.
Roemer, A., Medvedev, O. N. (2023). Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). In: Medvedev, O.N., Krägeloh, C.U., Siegert, R.J., Singh, N.N. (eds) Handbook of Assessment in Mindfulness Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77644-2_86-1
Rojas, M., & Charles-Leija, H. (2022). Chile, economic miracle, but… what’s about well-being? Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 30(59), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18504/pl3059-005-2022
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
Ruby, M. B., Falk, C. F., Heine, S. J., Villa, C., & Silberstein, O. (2012). Not all collectivisms are equal: Opposing preferences for ideal affect between East Asians and Mexicans. Emotion, 12(6), 1206–1209. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029118
Ruiz-Pérez, J. I., Melo-González, V., Velandia-Amaya, S. N., Rodríguez-Mesa, L. S., & Velázquez Monroy, C. A. (2021). PANAS Internacional Revisado: Propiedades psicométricas en una muestra internacional latina. Universitas Psychologica, 19, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy19.pirp
Sirgy, J. (2021). The psychology of quality of life: wellbeing and positive mental health (3rd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71888-6
Sokolov, B. (2019). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indices to lack of measurement invariance with categorical indicators and many groups. Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP 86/SOC/2019. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3417157
Tay-Karapas, K., Guzmán-González, M., Gómez, F., Comino, P., Salaberria, K., & Bahamondes, J. (2024). An attachment-based pilot program to promote adolescent adjustment to parental divorce. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 18(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-024-00729-9
Tay-Karapas, K., & Yárnoz-Yáben, S. (2019). Scale of positive and negative affect: Validation of PNA-10 in chilean youth. XVI European Congress of Psychology.
The Culture Factor Group. (2023). Country comparison tool.
Vera-Villarroel, P., Urzúa, A., Jaime, D., Contreras, D., Zych, I., Celis-Atenas, K., Silva, J. R., & Lillo, S. (2019). Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Psychometric properties and discriminative capacity in several Chilean samples. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 42(4), 473–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278717745344
Wang, Y. (2025). Educational sorting in unions and subjective well-being in Europe: Gender differences and contextual variations. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 96, 101020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2025.101020
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
Yárnoz-Yaben, S., Comino, P., & Sansinenea, E. (2014). La PNA-10, Una escala breve para evaluar afecto positivo y negativo en español. Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual, 22(4), 327–343.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Articles and conference papers published in Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology are distributed under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Correspondingly, authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
