What happened to the clinical approach to case study in psychological research? A clinical psychological analysis of scientific articles in high impact-factor journals

Authors

  • Viviana Langher Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome
  • Andrea Caputo Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome
  • Gabriella Martino Department of Cognitive Science, Psychological, Educational and Cultural Studies, University of Messina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/2282-1619/2017.5.1670

Keywords:

Case study, Impact factor, Psychological research, Research method

Abstract

The paper aims at investigating the incidence of case studies in high impact factor psychological journals and at creating a paradigm model which may conceptualize and explain the different uses and purposes of case study as research method. Overall, 6,393 articles from 16 psychological journals published in the 5-year period 2007-2011 were examined. Results show the low incidence of case studies (n=16) equal to about 0.25% out of the total. In addition, grounded theory allows the detection of two main thematic area: neuroscience and psychosocial risk. In neuroscientific research, case study seems mainly to serve as critical case in testing well-formulated theories. Instead, with regard to psychosocial risk, case study is regarded as useful for psychological intervention in both exceptional events management and best practices-related innovation in atypical fields.

References

Archambault, E., & Larivière, V. (2009). History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences. Scientometrics, 79(3), 639-653. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-2036-x Boor, M. (1982). The citation impact factor: Another dubious index of journal quality. American Psychologist, 37, 975–977. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.37.8.975 Carlsmith, H., Ellsworth, P., & Aronson, E. (1976). Methods of research in social psychology. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Caputo, A. (2014a). Exploring quality of life in Italian patients with rare disease: a computer-aided content analysis of illness stories. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 19(2), 211-221. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2013.793372 Caputo, A. (2014b). The social construction of envy in scientific community: an analysis of scholarly psychological publications. Studia Psychologica, 56(2), 109-125. Caputo, A. (2015a). Sharing problem gamblers’ experiences: A text analysis of gambling stories via online forum. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 3(1), 1-26. doi: 10.6092/2282-1619/2015.3.1051 Caputo, A. (2015b). Trends of psychology-related research on euthanasia: a qualitative software-based thematic analysis of journal abstracts. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 20(7), 858-869. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2014.993405 Caputo, A., Giacchetta, A., & Langher, V. (2016). AIDS as social construction: text mining of AIDS-related information in the Italian press. AIDS Care, 28(9), 1171-1176. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1153591 Caputo, A., & Rastelli, V. (2014). School improvement plans and student achievement: Preliminary evidence from the Quality and Merit Project in Italy. Improving Schools, 17(1), 72-98. doi:10.1177/1365480213515800 Cook, T. D., & Payne, M. R. (2002). Objecting to the objections to using random assignment in educational research. In R. Boruch & F. Mosteller (Eds.), Evidence matters: Randomized trials in education research (pp. 150–178). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006) Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245. DOI: 10.1177/1077800405284363 Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine. Kazdin, A. E. (1980). Research design in clinical psychology. New York: Harper & Row. Langher, V., Brancadoro, B., D'Angeli, M., & Caputo, A. (2014). Imagining future internship in professional psychology: A study on university students' representations. Universitas Psychologica, 13(4), 15-27. doi:10.11144/Javeriana.UPSY13-4.ifip Langher, V., Ricci, M. E., Propersi, F., Glumbic, N., & Caputo, A. (2016). Inclusion in Mozambique: a case study on a cooperative learning intervention. Cultura Y Educaciòn: Culture and Education, 28(1), 47-71. doi: 10.1080/11356405.2015.1120447 Mills, A.J., Durepos, G. & Wiebe, E. (2010). Encyclopedia of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781412957397. Open Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251). DOI:10.1126/science.aac4716 Runyan, W. M. (1982). In defense of the case study method. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52, 440-446. DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1982.tb01430.x Shallice, T. (1979). Case study approach in neuropsychological research. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1(3), 183–211. DOI: 10.1080/01688637908414450 Shavelson, R. J., & Towne, L. (Eds.). (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy Press. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Thorne, F.C. (1977). The citation index: Another case of spurious validity. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 1157-1161. DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(197710)33:43.0.CO;2-B Walters, G. D. (2006). Measuring the Utility of Journals in the Crime-Psychology Field: Beyond the Impact Factor. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 57(13), 1804-1813. DOI: 10.1002/asi.20382 Yin, R. K. (1970). Face recognition by brain-injured patients: A dissociable ability? Neuropsychologia, 8, 395-402. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(70)90036-9 Yin, R. K. (1978). Face perception: A review of experiments with infants, normal adults, and brain injured persons. In R. Held, H. Liebowitz, & H.L. Teuber (Eds.), Handbook of sensory physiology (Vol. 8: Perception) (pp. 593-608). New York: Springer Verlag. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-46354-9_18 Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Downloads

Published

30-12-2017

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 3 (2017)

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License Articles and conference papers published in Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology are distributed under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Correspondingly, authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).