The symbol theory in S. Freud, C. G. Jung and C. S. Peirce
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/2282-1619/2017.5.1624Keywords:
Semiotics, Symbol, Phenomenology, Dynamic Psychology, Analytical PsychologyAbstract
The work is aimed at studying three points of view, whose convergences and conflicts deepen the theme of the symbol, where the same faces to the psychic life full of meaning. The process of signification of objects in fact, provides an opportunity for knowledge of the psychic life of the subjects. As the product of mind, therefore, the attention falls, from semiotics, on the meanings of the dynamic psychology, whether it is psychoanalysis or analytical psychology. In this sense, from a phenomenological and semiotic approach, based on Peirceiane mode of existence of the sign, the analysis continues with the theme of the return of the Freudian symbol to converge to the common and different aspects of Jungian analytic theory. The convergent products of the different approaches, in fact, provide the ability to grasp what regardless of theory and hermeneutics, remains in the clinical context through the possibility of profound contact with the subject.
References
Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. (V. W. McGee, trad.), Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. (Trabalho original publicado em 1961)
Botella, S. (2005). L'Œdipe du ça ou Œdipe sans complexe. Revue française de psychanalyse, 69(3), 717-729.
Bourdin, D. (2005). Logique, sémiotique, pragmatisme et métaphysique. Revue française de psychanalyse, 69(3), 733-747.
Colman, W. (2011). Symbolic objects and the analytic frame. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 56(2), 184-202.
E Morin, Le idee: habitat, vita, organizzazione, usi e costumi, tr. it A. Serra, Milano, Feltrinelli, 1993, p. 31
Freud, S., Studi sull’isteria e altri scritti, 1886-1895, Opere, 1, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino 1967
Galimberti U., Psichiatria e fenomenologia, Feltrinelli, Milano, 1996
Gembillo, G., Gembillo, G., & Gembillo, G. ,2009, Da Einstein a Mandelbrot. le Lettere, p.203
Green André, Idées directrices pour une psychanalyse contemporaine, chap. 5 : « Configurations de la tiercéité », Paris, PUF, 2002, pp. 249-267.
Hermans, H., & Kempen, H. (1993). The dialogical self: meaning as movement. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Hogenson, G. B. (2004). What are symbols symbols of? Situated action, mythological bootstrapping and the emergence of the Self. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 49(1), 67-81.)
Jaffé, A. (1983). Il simbolismo nelle arti figurative. JUNG, Carl.
Jung C. G., (1983), L’albero filosofico, trad. it. Boringhieri, Torino, cit., p. 74
Jung C. G., La funzione trascendente, in Opere, Boringhieri, Torino, 1969, volVIII. p.89
Jung C. G., Spirito e vita, 1926, in Opere, Boringhieri, Torino 1969, vol. VIII. p.360-361
Jung, C, G, (1921). Psychological Types. CW 6
Jung, C, G, (2009). The Red Book. (Liber Novus). Ed. S. Shamdasani. New York & London: W.W. Norton.
Jung, C. G. (1959). Aion: Researches into the Phenomenology of the Self. CW 9ii.
Jung, C. G., von Franz, M. L., von Franz, M. L., & von Franz, M. L. (1991).L'uomo ei suoi simboli. J. Freeman (Ed.). Tea.
Jung, C. G.,1912. Simboli della trasformazione. Opere di Carl Gustav Jung.
Jung, C. G.,1921, Tipi Psicologici, Opere, vol. VI, Boringhieri, Torino., pag. 484
Lacan Jacques, Le Séminaire, Livre VII : L’éthique de la psychanalyse (1959-1960), Paris, Le Seuil, 1986, séminaire du 13 janvier 1960.
Lacan Jacques, Le Séminaire, Livre XIX : ... Ou pire (1971-1972), séminaires des 1er et 21 juin 1975.
Lacan Jacques, Le Séminaire, Livre XV : L’acte psychanalytique (1967-1968), inédit : séminaires des 7 et 28 février 1968.
Lacan Jacques, Le Séminaire, Livre XXIII : Le sinthome (1975-1976), séminaire du 16 mars 1976.
Lacan Jacques, Le Séminaire, Livre XXIV : L’insu que sait de l’une-bévue s’aile à mourre (1976-1977), séminaire du 11 janvier 1977.
Michel, M., & Andacht, F. (2016). Passos para uma convergência de duas teorias dialógicas do self. Psicologia USP, 27(2), 246-254.
Morin, E., & Serra, A. (1993). Le idee: habitat, vita, organizzazione, usi e costumi. Feltrinelli.
Peirce C.S. (19311958), Collected papers, Harvard University Press, MA p.140
Peirce, C. S. (1974). Collected papers of charles sanders peirce (Vol. 5). Harvard University Press.
Peirce, C. S., Fouchier-Axelsen, B., Foz, C., & Savan, D. (1987). Textes fondamentaux de sémiotique. Collection d'épistémologie.
Raggatt, P. (2010). The dialogical self and thirdness: a semiotic approach to positioning using dialogical triads. Theory & Psychology, 20(3), 400-419.
Wiley, N. (1994). The semiotic self. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wiley, N. (2006). Pragmatism and the dialogical self. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 1(1), 5-21.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Articles and conference papers published in Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology are distributed under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Correspondingly, authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
