Relations among Gender, Religiosity, Personality Traits in homophobia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/2612-4033/0110-2046Abstract
Background: Recognizing the multifactorial discrimination towards gays and lesbians, Hudson and Rickett (1980) proposed a distinction between homo-negativity, conceptualized as the set of behaviors and negative patterns towards the homosexual community, and homophobia thought as an emotional response to anxiety and discomfort. Aims: The main objective of this research was to investigate psychological characteristics of southern young and older adults, divided in two groups, and with different religious convictions and behaviors in relation to the different presence of homophobic attitudes and behavior. Methods: 300 subjects, were recruited with reference to the gender (52% F, 48% M), selected among students and teachers of a high school in the Calabrian region. It was administered a socio-cultural questionnaire to collect general information. In order to evaluate personality traits, the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Revised–Short Form Italian version was administered. The Modern Homophobia Scale (Morrison and Morrison, 2002) was administered to evaluate the homophobic behavior, analyzing gayphobia and lesbophobia separately. Results: The study revealed significant differences in the tendency to assume homophobic behaviors related to the two different generational bands. Adults showed greater tendencies to take homophobic behaviors, both for gays and lesbians, in comparison with the generation of young adults. Moreover, it was analyzed the discomfort that could emerge in the relation with gays and lesbians, believing that homosexuality is a deviant behavior and the support to institutions which discriminate against homosexuality. Discussion: Older adults had greater homophobia traits than young people living in the same southern territory. This result is important from the application point of view because it shows that the continuous, attempts at intervention and campaigns on homophobic behavior are leading important results and this should stimulate to always and deeply promote it on the basis of correlational studies presented by scientific community.
References
Ciocca, G., Capuano, N., Tuziak, B., Mollaioli, D., Limoncin, E., Valsecchi, D., et al. (2015). Italian Validation of Homophobia Scale (HS). Sexual Medicine, 3(3), 213-218
Eysenck, H. J. (1988). Personality and scientific aesthetics, in F. H. Farley and R. W. Neperud (eds), The Foundations of Aesthetics, Art and Art Education, pp. 117-160.
Eysenck, H.J.&Eysenck S. B.G. (2004) EPQ-R Eysenck Personality Questionnaire – Forma ridotta. In: Scale di personalità Eysenck per adulti. Organizzazioni Speciali, Giunti, Firenze
Fisher N.L. &Seidman, S. (Eds) (2016) Introducing the new sexuality studies (3rd ed.) New York: Routledge
Herek, G.M. (1988). Heterosexuals’ Attitudes toward Lesbians and Gay Men: Correlates and Gender Differences. The Journal of Sex Research, 25, 451-477. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498809551476
Herek, G.M. (2000). Sexual Prejudice and Gender: Do Heterosexuals' Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men Differ? Journal of Social Issues 56(2), 251 – 266. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00164
Lingiardi V., Falanga S., D’Augelli A.R. (2005) The Evaluation of Homophobia in an Italian Sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior 34(1), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-005-1002-z
Lingiardi, V., Nardelli, N., Ioverno, S., Falanga, S., Di Chiacchio, C. Tanzilli, A., Baiocco, R. (2016). Homonegativity in Italy: Cultural issues, personality characteristics, and demographic correlates with negative attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 13(2), pp. 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-015-0197-6
Morrison, M. A., & Morrison, T. G. (2002). Development and validation of a scale measuring modern prejudice toward gay men and lesbian women. J Homosex, 43(2), 15-37.
Nagoshi, J. L., Adams, K. A., Terrell, H. K., Hill, E. D., Brzuzy, S., &Nagoshi, C. T. (2008). Gender differences in correlates of homophobia and transphobia. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 59(7-8), 521-531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9458-7
Nagoshi J.L. Brzuzy S. (2010), Transgender Theory: Embodying Research and Practice. Affilia, 25 (4), 431-443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109910384068
Olson K.R., Key A.C., Eaton N.R. (2015). Gender Cognition in Transgender Children. Psychological Science, 26 (4), 467-474 https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614568156
Pacilli M.G., Taurino A., Jost J.T., van der Toorn J. (2011) System Justification, Right-Wing Conservatism, and Internalized Homophobia: Gay and Lesbian Attitudes toward Same-Sex Parenting in Italy. Sex Roles, 65 (7), 580-595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9969-5
Polimeni, A.M., Hardie, E., & Buzwell, S. (2000). Homophobia among Australian heterosexuals: The role of sex, gender role ideology, and gender role traits. Current Research in Social Psychology, 5, 1–10
Rollè, L., Brustia, P., Caldarera, E. (2014). Homophobia and Transphobia. In: A.C Michalos (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 2905- 2910). Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer
Yeck A.T., Anderson V.N. (2018) Homosexuality as Haram: Relations among Gender, Contact, Religiosity, and Sexual Prejudice in Muslim Individuals. Sex Roles. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0989-2
Taylor, C., & Peter, T. (2011). "We are not aliens, we're people, and we have rights." Canadian human rights discourse and high school climate for LGBTQ students. Canadian Review of Sociology, 48(3), 275-312.
Theodore P.S, &Basow, S.A. (2000) Heterosexual Masculinity and Homophobia. Journal of Homosexuality, 40 (2), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v40n02_03
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Articles and conference papers published in Journal of Clinical and Development Psychology are distributed under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Correspondingly, authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).