AI Imaginaries and Narratives in the Italian Public Discourse: The Impact of ChatGPT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7413/2281813819593Parole chiave:
Artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, Imaginaries, Narratives, Media coverageAbstract
Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have sparked renewed interest and debate, particularly with the introduction of innovative "generative" AI systems such as OpenAI's ChatGPT. This innovation has reignited discussions about AI's implications in today's digital societies, often polarizing opinions between optimistic views and tragic risks, frequently fueled by sci-fi or sensationalist narratives.
This study aims to investigate the imaginaries and narratives of AI in leading Italian newspapers, specifically evaluating the impact of ChatGPT on public discourse.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Bartolomew J., Mehta D. (2023), “How the media is covering ChatGPT”, Columbia Journalism Review, Retrieved on 10 May 2024 from https://www.cjr.org/tow_center/media-coverage-chatgpt.php.
Beer, D. (2009), “Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological Unconscious”, New Media & Society, 11(6): 985-1002.
Bennato D. (2024), La società del XXI secolo. Persone, dati, tecnologie, Roma-Bari, Laterza.
Boccia Artieri, G. (2020), “Fare sociologia attraverso l’algoritmo: potere, cultura e agency”, Sociologia Italiana, 15: 137-148.
Brenner J.S., Howard P.N., Nielsen R.K. (2018), “An Industry-Led Debate: How UK Media Cover Artificial Intelligence (Factsheet)”, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, Retrieved on 10 May 2024 from: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2018-12/Brennen_UK_Media_Coverage_of_AI_FINAL.pdf.
Castells M. (1996), The information age: economy, society and culture. Volume 1: The rise of the network society, Cambridge (MA, US), Blackwell.
Cave S., Craig C., Dihal K., Dillon S., Montgomery J., Singler B., Taylor L. (2018), Portrayals and perceptions of AI and why they matter, London, The Royal Society.
Cave S., Dihal K. (2019), “Hopes and fears for intelligent machines in fiction and reality”, Nat Mach Intell, 1:74-78.
Cools H., Baldwin V.G., Opgenhaffen M. (2022), “Where exactly between utopia and dystopia? A framing analysis of AI and automation in US newspapers”, Journalism 0(0): 1-19.
Cristianini, N. (2023), The shortcut: why intelligent machines do not think like us, Boca Raton (FL, US), CRC Press.
Cristianini N. (2024), Machina sapiens. L’algoritmo che ci ha rubato il segreto della conoscenza, Bologna, Il Mulino.
Dandurand, G., McKelvey, F., & Roberge, J. (2023), “Freezing out: Legacy media's shaping of AI as a cold controversy”, Big Data & Society, 10(2): 1-13.
DeFleur M., Ball-Rokeach S. (1989), “Media system dependency theory”, in DeFleur M, Ball-Rokeach S (ed.) Theories of mass communication, New York Longman, 292-327.
Degli Esposti P., Tirabassi L. (2024), “The Human-algorithmic Entanglement in the News Realm”, Problemi dell'informazione, 1: 41-64.
Esposito E. (2022), Artificial communication. How algorithms produce social intelligence, Boston (US), Mit Press.
Fereday, J., Muir-Cochrane E. (2006), “Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development”, International journal of qualitative methods, 5(1): 80-92.
Floridi L. (2009), Infosfera. Filosofia e Etica dell'informazione, Torino, Giappichelli Editore.
Floridi L., Chiriatti M. (2020), “GPT‑3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences”, Minds and Machines, 30: 681-694.
Fuchs C., Can Arslan S., Allmer T. (2024) “Critical Perspectives on Digital Capitalism: Theories and Praxis. Introduction to the Special Issue”, tripleC 22 (1): 140-147.
Griswold, W. (2012), Cultures and societies in a changing world, London, Sage.
Lindgren S., Holmstrom J. (2020), “A Social Science perspective on Artificial Intelligence: building blocks for a research agenda”, Journal of Digital Social Research, 2(3): 1-15.
Mitchell M. (2019), Artificial Intelligence: A Guide for Thinking Humans, London (UK), Penguin.
Noble S. (2018), Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism, New York, New York University Press.
Ouchchy L., Coin A., Dubljević V. (2020), “AI in the headlines: the portrayal of the ethical issues of artificial intelligence in the media”, AI & Society, 35: 927-936.
Jungherr A., Schroeder R. (2023), “Artificial intelligence and the public arena”, Communication Theory, 33(2-3): 164-173.
Sarani G., Cobianchi V. (2021), “L’intelligenza ‘media’ artificiale”, Osservatorio di Pavia, 16 febbraio 2021, Retrieved on 10 May 2024 from: https://www.osservatorio.it/lintelligenza-media-artificiale.
Sartori L., Theodorou A. (2022), “A sociotechnical perspective for the future of AI: narratives, inequalities, and human control”, Ethics and Information Technology, 24(4): 1-11.
Sartori L., Bocca G. (2022), “Minding the gap(s): public perceptions of and socio-technical imaginaries”, AI & Soc, 38: 443-458.
Simon M.F. (2022), “Uneasy Bedfellows: AI in the News, Platform Companies and the Issue of Journalistic Autonomy”, Digital Journalism, 10(10): 1832-1854.
Dowloads
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).