Free to do evil. Some possible implications of moral enhancement for free will and moral responsibility
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7413/22818138059Keywords:
human enhancement, moral enhancement, bioethics, neuroethics, free will, moral responsibility.Abstract
In recent years the progress of biomedical technologies has enabled man to enhance his physical and cognitive abilities by using pharmaceutical, surgical, or genetic techniques. In social imaginary many worries are raised by this new possibility to go beyond the limits set up by nature, even though remote. In the wider framework of human enhancement we will examine a particular one: moral bioenhancement. More specifically it is the use of new biomedical technologies to improve our acting or reflecting morally. These kinds of prospective interventions raise many ethical issues. We will focus specifically on the implications for human freedom and consequently for moral responsibility. Although these concepts could be threatened by moral bioenhancement we could imagine a futuristic scenario where these kinds of interventions could have a useful social employment.References
Agar N. (2013), Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?, Journal of medical ethics, 39(2): 67-74.
Agar N. (2014), A question about defining moral bioenhancement, Journal of Medical Ethics, 40 (6): 369-370.
Buchanan A. (2011), Better than human: the promise and perils of enhancing ourselves, New York, Oxford University Press.
Bostrom N. and Roache R. (2007), Ethical issues in human enhancement, in J. Ryberg, T. S. Petersen and C. Wolf (eds.), New Waves in Applied Ethics, 120-152, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
Bostrom N. and Savulescu J. (2009), Human enhancement ethics: The state of the debate, in J. Savulescu and N. Bostrom (eds.), Human enhancement, 1-22, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Chisholm R. M. (1961), Responsibility and avoidability, in S. Hook (ed.), Determinism and Freedom in the Age of Modern Science, 145-147, New York, Collier Books.
Churchland P. S. (2011), Braintrust: What neuroscience tells us about morality, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Curtis B. L. (2012), Moral Enhancement as Rehabilitation?, AJOB Neuroscience, 3(4): 23-24.
De Grazia D. (2014), Moral enhancement, freedom, and what we (should) value in moral behaviour, Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(6): 361-8.
De Waal F. B. M. (1996), Good natured: The origins of right and wrong in humans and other animals, Cambridge, Harvard University Press
Douglas T. (2008), Moral enhancement, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 25(3): 228-245.
Douglas, T. (2013), Moral enhancement via direct emotion modulation: A reply to John Harris, Bioethics, 27(3): 160-168.
Frankfurt H. G. (1969), Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility, The Journal of Philosophy, 66(23): 829-839.
Fukuyama F. (2002), Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution, New York, Picador Books.
Harris J. (2011), Moral enhancement and freedom, Bioethics, 25(2): 102-111.
Harris J. (2013a), ‘Ethics is for bad guys!’ Putting the ‘moral’ into moral enhancement, Bioethics, 27(3): 169-173.
Harris J. (2013b), Moral progress and moral enhancement, Bioethics, 27(5): 285-290.
Harris J. (2014), Taking liberties with free fall, Journal of medical ethics, 40(6): 371-374.
Harris J. and Savulescu J. (2015), A Debate about Moral Enhancement, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 24(01): 8-22.
Horstkötter D., Berghmans R., and de Wert G. (2012), Moral enhancement for antisocial behavior? An uneasy relationship, AJOB Neuroscience, 3(4): 26-28.
Kass L. (2002), Life, liberty, and the defense of dignity: The challenge for bioethics, San Francisco, Encounter Books.
Mehlman M. J. (2012), Transhumanist dreams and dystopian nightmares: The promise and peril of genetic engineering, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.
Persson I. and Savulescu J. (2008), The perils of cognitive enhancement and the urgent imperative to enhance the moral character of humanity, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 25(3): 162-177.
Persson I. and Savulescu J. (2012), Unfit for the future: The need for moral enhancement, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Persson I. and Savulescu J. (2013), Getting moral enhancement right: the desirability of moral bioenhancement, Bioethics, 27(3): 124-131.
Raki! V. (2014), Voluntary moral enhancement and the survival-at-any-cost bias, Journal of medical ethics, 40(4): 246-250.
Raus K., Focquaert F., Schermer M., Specker J. and Sterckx S. (2014), On defining moral enhancement: a clarificatory taxonomy, Neuroethics, 7(3): 263-273.
Ricoeur P. (1950), Philosophie de la Volonté I. Le Volontaire et l'lnvolontaire, Aubier, Paris, eng. transl. 1966, Freedom and nature: The voluntary and the involuntary (Vol. 1), Evanstone, Northwestern University Press.
Ricoeur P. (1990),! Soi-même comme un autre, Paris, Seuil; eng. transl. 1992, Oneself as another, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Savulescu J. and Bostrom N. (2009), Human enhancement, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Savulescu J., Meulen R. H. J. and Kahane G. (2011), Enhancing human capacities, Chichester, West Sussex, U.K, Wiley-Blackwell.
Selgelid M. J. (2014), Freedom and moral enhancement, Journal of medical ethics, 40(4): 215-216.
Shook J. R. (2012), Neuroethics and the possible types of moral enhancement, AJoB Neuroscience, 3(4): 3-14.
Simkulet W. (2012), On moral enhancement, AJoB Neuroscience, 3(4): 17–18.
Wilson E. O. (1975), Sociobiology: The new synthesis, Cambridge, Mass., Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
