The Apocalypse and the scientific imaginary

Auteurs

  • Bertrand Vidal <div class="page" title="Page 1"> <div class="section" style="background-color: rgb(100.000000%, 100.000000%, 100.000000%);"> <div class="layoutArea"> <div class="column"> <p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;">Institut de Recherches Sociologiques et Anthropologiques - Centre de Recherche sur l’Imaginaire Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier </span></p> </div> </div> </div> </div>

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.7413/22818138052

Mots-clés :

Doomsday Clock, scientific belief, Apocalypse, anthropocene, secularization, apocalyptic imaginary

Résumé

According to the French specialist in sociology of science and collective knowledge, Gérald Bronner, “our worldview can be understood in two ways: knowledge or belief” (2009:21). In other words: Science of Hope, However, when science – privileged domain of objective and rational knowledge – become alarmist (ex. The scaremongering strategies about the global effects of climate change), knowledge can also be tainted by irrationality and belief. That is the case, especially, concerning the Doomsday Clock.
In fact, from sociological point of view, instead of reporting objectively and scientifically the threat, the Atomic Scientists, by capturing the pattern of Apocalypse, have allowed a secularization and deconsecration of eschatology. Henceforth, the Apocalypse is not a theological prophecy, but a secular possibility. “The danger is great, but our message is not one of hopelessness” said Kennette Benedict, BAS executive director.

Références

Augé, M. (2013), Les nouvelles peurs. Paris: Payot.
Barnosky, A. D., et al. (2012), “Approaching a state shift in Earth's biosphere”. In Nature 486: 52-58.
Beck, U. (1986), Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Besret, B. (1964), Incarnation ou eschatologie ? Contribution à l’histoire du vocabulaire religieux contemporain, 1935-1955. Paris: Cerf.
Bonneuil, C. and Fressoz, J.-B. (2013), L’Evénement anthropocène. La Terre, l’histoire et nous. Paris: Seuil.
Bronner, G. (2009), La pensée extrême. Comment des hommes ordinaires deviennent des fanatiques. Paris: Denoêl.
Chelebourg, C. (2012), Les Ecofictions. Mythologies de la fin du monde. Paris: Les impressions nouvelles.
Debray, R. (2011), Du bon usage des catastrophes. Paris: Gallimard.
Duclos, D. (1989), La Peur et le Savoir. La Société face à la science, la technique et leurs dangers. Paris: La Découverte.
Eden, L. and al. (2015), “Three Minutes and Counting”. In Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Retrieved on 4 September 2015 from http://thebulletin.org/three-minutes-and-counting7938
Ewald, F (1986), L’Etat providence. Paris: Grasset
Giddens, A. (1990), Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Grataloup, C. (2007), Géohistoire de la mondialisation. Le temps long du monde. Paris: Armand Colin.
Latour, B. (2014), “L’Antrhopocène et la destruction de l’image du Globe“. In E. Hache (ed.) De l’univers clos au monde infini. 27-54. Paris: Dehors.
Marcel, G. (1948), “Pessimisme et conscience eschatologique“. In Dieu vivant. Perspectives religieuses et philosophiques, 10. 119--27.
Mary, L. (2009), Le Mythe de la fin du monde. De l’antiquité à 2012. Paris: Trajectoire.
Minois, G. (1996), Histoire de l’avenir. Des Prophètes à la prospective. Paris: Fayard.
Mooers, A. (2012), “Study predicts imminent irreversible planetary collapse“, In Media Release of Simon Fraser University, June 06, 2012. Retrieved on 11 February 2016 from http://www.sfu.ca/university-communications/media-releases/2012/study-predicts-imminent-irreversible-planetary-collapse.htmlMounier, E. (1948), La Petite peur du XXème siècle. Neuchatel: La Baconnière.
Parfrey, A. (eds) (1988), Apocalypse Culture. New York: Amok Press.
Riesel, R. and Semprun, J. (2008), Catastrophisme. Administration du désastre et soumission durable. Paris: Encyclopédie des Nuisances.
Say, J.-B. (1815), Catéchisme d’économie politique. Paris: Guillaumin.
Vidal, B. (2012), “Survivre au désastre et se préparer au pire“. In Les cahiers de psychologie politique, 20. Retrieved on 4 September 2015 from http://lodel.irevues.inist.fr/cahierspsychologiepolitique/index.php?id=2048Vidal, B. (2012b), Les représentations collectives de l’événement-catastrophe. Etude sociologique sur les peurs contemporaines. Montpellier, Braga: Université Paul-Valéry ; Université do Minho.
Virilio, P. and Richard, B. (2010), L’Administration de la peur. Paris: Textuel.
Weber, M. (1958), “Science as a Vocation”. In Gerth, H.H and Mills, C.W. (eds) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. 134-156. New York: University Press.

Téléchargements

Publiée

2016-03-10

Numéro

No 6 (2015): Technlogy and/as imaginary

Rubrique

Topic

Licence

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).