Il potere della luce. La lampada e le forme microsociologiche del dominio
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7413/2281813819615Parole chiave:
Everyday life, Material culture, Aesthetic politics, Microsociology, Agency and Social StructureAbstract
The Power of Light. The Lamp and the Microsociological Forms of Domination.
This article explores the sociological significance of everyday objects through a microsociological analysis of the lamp. While traditional sociology has often neglected material culture, dismissing objects as mere fetishes of mass society, this study reclaims their active role in shaping social life. Drawing on Simmel's notion of culture and style, as well as theories by Gehlen, Simondon, Baudrillard, and Latour, the lamp is examined not only as a technical device but as a symbolic and aesthetic mediator of social relations. Focusing on the domestic sphere, the analysis traces how lighting structures interaction, produces atmospheres, and participates in the microphysics of power. Particular attention is given to the lampshade as a device of modulation—both functional and ornamental—that configures proximity, visibility, and distinction. Ultimately, the lamp emerges as an infrastructure of experience that shapes the social through light, material presence, and symbolic excess.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Alexander J. C. (2004), “Cultural Pragmatics: Social Performance between Ritual and Strategy”, Sociological Theory, 22 (4): 527-573.
Appadurai A. (ed.) (1986), The Social Life of Things. Commodities in Cultural Perspective, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Bachelard G. (1961), La flamme d’une chandelle, Paris, Les Presses Universitaires de France.
Baudrillard J. (2004), Il delitto perfetto. La televisione ha ucciso la realtà?, Milano, Raffaello Cortina Editore.
Baudrillard J. (2007), Lo scambio simbolico e la morte, Milano, Feltrinelli.
Baudrillard J. (2007), Il sistema degli oggetti, Bologna, Bompiani.
Baudrillard J. (2010), La società dei consumi, Bologna, Il Mulino.
Baudrillard J. (2010), Per una critica dell’economia politica del segno, Milano, Mimesis.
Baudrillard J. (2014), Dimenticare Foucault, Milano, PGreco.
Benjamin W. (2002), I «passages» di Parigi, Torino, Einaudi.
Berger P., Luckmann T. (1969), The Social Construction of Reality, New York, Doubleday and Co.
BiJker W., Hughes T., Pinch T. (eds.) (1989), The Social Construction of Technological Systems. New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, London, MIT Press.
Bijker W. (1995), Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change, London, MIT Press.
Bourdieu P. (1979), La Distinction: Critique sociale du jugement, Paris, Les Édition de Minuit.
Bourdieu P. (2015), Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique. Précédé de « Trois études d’ethnologie kabyle », Paris, Seuil.
Callon M. (1998), The Laws of the Markets, Oxford (UK), Blackwell Publishers
Cranz G. (2000), The Chair: Rethinking Culture, Body, and Design, New York, Norton & Company.
Douglas M., Isherwood B. (1979), The World of Goods, New York, Basic Books.
Featherstone M. (2007), Consumer Culture and Postmodernism, London, Sage.
Fiske J. (1989), Understanding Popular Culture, London, Unwin Hyman.
Fitzi G. (2019), The The Challenge of Modernity. Simmel’s Sociological Theory, London-NewYork, Routledge.
Foucault M. (1993), Sorvegliare e punire. Nascita della prigione, Torino, Einaudi
du Gay P., Hall S., Janes L., Koed Madsen A., Mackay H., Negus K. (2013), Doing Cultural Studies. The Story of the Sony Walkman, Los Angeles, Sage.
Geertz C. (1973), The Interpretation of Cultures, New York, Basic Books.
Gehlen A. (1994), L’uomo nell’era della tecnica. Problemi socio-psicologici della civiltà industriale, Milano, SugarCo.
Gehlen A. (2005), Prospettive antropologiche. L’uomo alla scoperta di sé, Bologna, Il Mulino.
Gehlen A. (2010), L’uomo. La sua natura e il suo posto nel mondo, Milano, Mimesis.
Gell, A. (1998), Art and Agency, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Giddens A. (1978), La struttura di classe nelle società avanzate, Bologna, Il Mulino.
Harvey D. (1990), The Condition of Postmodernity. An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change, Hoboken, Wiley-Blackwell.
Hebdige D. (1979), Subculture: The Meaning of Style, London, Metheun.
Latour B. (1992), “Where Are the Missing Masses,” in W. E. Bijker and J. Law (eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society, Cambridge, (MA), MIT Press.
Latour B. (1993), We Have Never Been Modern, Cambridge (MA) Harvard University Press.
Levine D. M. (2001), “Le posizioni contraddittorie di Simmel sulla cultura moderna”, Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, XLII (4): 541-548.
Maffesoli M. (1996), Éloge de la raison sensible, Paris, Grasset & Fasquelle.
Maffesoli M. (2008), Iconologies. Nos idol@tries postmodernes, Paris, Albin Michel.
Marx K. (1970), Il capitale. Critica dell’economia politica, Roma, Newton Compton.
McLuhan M. (1994), Understanding Media. The Extensions of Man, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.
Molotch H. (2005), Fenomenologia del tostapane. Come gli oggetti quotidiani diventano quello che sono, Milano, Raffaello Cortina.
Molotch H. (2011), “Objects in Sociology”, in: Clarke A.J. (eds.) Design Anthropology, Vienna, Springer.
Rancière J. (2022), La partizione del sensibile. Estetica e politica, Roma, DeriveApprodi.
Ruggieri D. (2019), Lo sguardo dell’altro. Cultura, individuo e socializzazione nel pensiero di Georg Simmel, Milano, Meltemi.
Schivelbusch W. (1995), Disenchanted Night. The Industrialization of Light in the Nineteenth Century, Berkeley, The University of California Press.
SimmelG. (1976), “Concetto e tragedia della cultura”, in G. Simmel, Arte e civiltà, Milano, ISEDI.
Simmel G. (1998), Sociologia, Torino, Edizioni Comunità.
Simmel G. (2004), Filosofia del denaro, Torino, UTET.
Simmel G. (2006), “Il problema dello stile”, in G. Simmel, Estetica e sociologia, Roma, Armando.
Simmel G. (2011), Le metropoli e la vita dello spirito, Roma, Armando.
Simondon G. (2012), Du Mode d'existence des objets techniques, Paris, Aubier.
Simondon G. (2014), Sur la technique (1953-1983), Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.
Tramontana A. (2019), I cristalli della società. Simmel, Benjamin, Gehlen, Baudrillard e l’esistenza multiforme degli oggetti, Milano, Meltemi.
Veblen T. (1991), The Theory of the Leisure Class, London, Routledge.
Wulf C. (2018), Homo imaginationis. Le radici estetiche dell’antropologia storico-culturale, Milano, Mimesis.
Dowloads
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
