The Social Atmospheres of the Imaginary
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13129/2281-8138/2026.1.16-49Keywords:
Modernity Social Atmosphere , Imaginary , Neophenomenological Sociology, Hermann Schmitz , Georg SimmelAbstract
This article proposes treating the notions of atmosphere and imaginary, despite their apparent conceptual evanescence, as analytical tools capable of grasping together the sensible and the symbolic dimensions of associated life. It aims to move beyond sociocentrism to explore what we call the dark matter of social facts: the perceptual-symbolic sphere that orients collective experience before conscious deliberation. Drawing on the atmospheric turn of German neophenomenology and its sociological translation in Robert Gugutzer’s Neophenomenological Sociology, the article rereads the classics of the discipline as anticipators of a dispersed and unnamed proto-atmospheric web and then turns to contemporary sociology to ground the analytical dimensions and sociological definition of social atmosphere. Its original theoretical contribution lies in distinguishing between imaginative atmospheres, situated configurations in which feeling and imagining are attuned among co-present bodies in the here and now of the reciprocal action, and the atmospheric imaginary, the capacity of symbolic and cultural forms to objectify themselves and radiate sensibly into environments, thereby predisposing new atmospheres. By recomposing the Castoriadian instituting/instituted polarity and the grammar of the Durandian regimes within Simmel’s sociological aesthetics, the article demonstrates the dynamic circularity between feeling and imagining, opening an empirical agenda for a sociology of the atmospheres of the imaginary
References
Alexander J. C. (1990). Durkheimian Sociology: Cultural Studies. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Anderson B. (2009). Affective atmospheres. Emotion, Space and Society, 2(2), 77-81.
Anderson B. (2014). Encountering Affect: Capacities, Apparatuses, Conditions. Farnham, Ashgate.
Bellah R. N. (2011). Religion in Human Evolution: From the Paleolithic to the Axial Age. Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press.
Bellah R. N., Madsen R., Sullivan W. M., Swidler A. & Tipton S. M. (1985). Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley, University of California Press.
Bennett J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, Duke University Press.
Biehl-Missal B. & Saren M. (2012). Atmospheres of seduction: A critique of aesthetic marketing practices. Journal of Macromarketing, 32(2), 168-180.
Böhme G. (1995). Atmosphäre. Essays zur neuen Ästhetik. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.
Böhme G. (2017). The Aesthetics of Atmospheres. London, Routledge.
Bourdieu P. (1980). Le sens pratique. Paris, Minuit.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge, Polity Press.
Brennan T. (2004). The Transmission of Affect. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.
Cantó-Milà N. (2005). A Sociological Theory of Value: Georg Simmel’s Sociological Relationism. Bielefeld, transcript.
Castoriadis C. (1975). L’institution imaginaire de la société. Paris, Seuil.
Collins R. (2004). Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Crossley N. (2001). The Social Body: Habit, Identity and Desire. London, Sage.
Csordas T. J. (ed.) (1994). Embodiment and Experience: The Existential Ground of Culture and Self. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Davis M. S. (1973). Georg Simmel and the Aesthetics of Social Reality. Social Forces, 51(3), 320-329.
Durand G. (1960). Les structures anthropologiques de l’imaginaire. Introduction à l’archétypologie générale. Paris, PUF.
Durkheim É. (1893/1984). The Division of Labour in Society. London, Palgrave Macmillan.
Durkheim É. (1895/2013). The Rules of Sociological Method. London, Palgrave Macmillan.
Durkheim É. (1912/1995). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York, Free Press.
Fields K. E. (1995). Translator’s Introduction: Religion as an Eminently Social Thing. In É. Durkheim (Edited by), The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York, Free Press.
Frisby, D. (1981). Sociological Impressionism: A Reassessment of Georg Simmel’s Social Theory. London: Heinemann.
Frisby D. (1992). Simmel and Since: Essays on Georg Simmel’s Social Theory. London, Routledge.
Frisby D. (2001). Cityscapes of Modernity: Critical Explorations. Cambridge, Polity Press.
Goffman E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York, Aldine.
Goffman E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York, Doubleday.
Goffman E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York, Harper & Row.
Griffero T. (2013). Quasi-cose. La realtà dei sentimenti. Milano, Mondadori.
Griffero T. (2014). Atmospheres: Aesthetics of Emotional Spaces. Farnham, Ashgate.
Gugutzer R. (2017). Leib und Situation. Zum Theorie- und Forschungsprogramm der Neophänomenologischen Soziologie. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 46(3), 147-166.
Gugutzer R. (2022). Soziologie des Körpers. Bielefeld, transcript.
Gugutzer R. (2023). Das Pathos des Sozialen. Beiträge zur Neophänomenologischen Soziologie. Velbrück Wissenschaft, Weilerswist.
Gurisatti G. (2006). Dizionario fisiognomico. Il volto, le forme, l’espressione. Macerata, Quodlibet.
Heidegger M. (1927/2010). Being and Time. New York, The State University of New York Press (SUNY Press).
Han B.-C. (2013). Im Schwarm. Ansichten des Digitalen. Berlin, Matthes & Seitz.
Hasse, J. (2008). Die Stadt als Wohnraum. (ed.). Freiburg, Karl Alber.
Hochschild A. R. (1983). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, University of California Press.
Howes D. (2003). Sensual Relations: Engaging the Senses in Culture and Social Theory. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.
Husserl E. (1913/1950). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Den Haag, Nijhoff.
Joa,, H. & Knöbl, W. (2009). Social Theory: Twenty Introductory Lectures. Cambridge:, Cambridge University Press.
Julmi, C. (2017). Situations and Atmospheres in Organizations: A (New) Phenomenology of Being-in-the-Organization. Milano: Mimesis International.
Latour B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Levine D. N. (ed.) (1971). Georg Simmel: On Individuality and Social Forms. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Maffesoli M. (1988). Le temps des tribus. Le déclin de l’individualisme dans les sociétés de masse. Paris, Méridiens-Klincksieck.
Marzo P. L. (2007). Le metamorfosi: natura, artificio e tecnica. Milano, Franco Angeli.
Manent, P. (1982). Tocqueville et la nature de la démocratie. Paris, Julliard.
Marx K. (1844/1975). Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. In Marx & Engels Collected Works. Lawrence & Wishart/International Publishers.
Marx K. (1867/1975). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Volume 1. London:, Penguin Classics.
Marx K. & Engels F. (1845-1846/1975). The German Ideology. In Marx & Engels Collected Works. Lawrence & Wishart/International Publishers.
Masullo A. (2003). Patì. Il poter essere nell’agire passivo dell’esperienza. Napoli, Filema.
Mele V. (2006). Estetica e sociologia. Roma, Armando.
Pickering W. S. F. (1984). Durkheim’s Sociology of Religion: Themes and Theories. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Pine B. J. & Gilmore J. H. (1999). The Experience Economy: Work Is Theatre and Every Business a Stage. Boston, Harvard Business School Press.
Postone M. (1993). Time, Labor, and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx’s Critical Theory. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, Simon & Schuster.
Pyyhtinen O. (2018). The Simmelian Legacy. Cham, Palgrave Macmillan.
Rawls A. W. (2004). Epistemology and Practice: Durkheim’s “The Elementary Forms of Religious Life”. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Riedel F. (2019). Atmosphere. In J. Slaby and C. von Scheve (Edited by), Affective Societies: Key Concepts (pp. 85-95). London, Routledge.
Rosa H. (2016). Resonanz. Eine Soziologie der Weltbeziehung. Berlin, Suhrkamp.
Schmitz H. (1969). System der Philosophie. Bd. III/2: Der Gefühlsraum. Bonn, Bouvier.
Schmitz H. (1977). System der Philosophie. Bd. III/4: Das Göttliche und der Raum. Bonn, Bouvier.
Schmitz H. (2005). Situationen und Konstellationen. Wider die Ideologie totaler Vernetzung. Freiburg, Karl Alber.
Schmitz H. (2009). Kurze Einführung in die Neue Phänomenologie. Freiburg, Karl Alber.
Schmitz H. (2011). Der Leib. Berlin, De Gruyter.
Schmitz H. (2014). Atmosphären. Freiburg, Karl Alber.
Shilling C. (2003). The Body and Social Theory. London, Sage.
Shilling C. (2008). Changing Bodies: Habit, Crisis and Creativity. London, Sage.
Shilling C. & Mellor P. A. (1998). Durkheim, morality and modernity: Collective effervescence, homo duplex and the sources of moral action. British Journal of Sociology, 49(2), 193-209.
Sloterdijk, P. (1998). Sphären I: Blasen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Sloterdijk, P. (2004). Sphären III: Schäume. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Simmel G. (1896/1997). Sociological Aesthetics. In D. Frisby and M. Featherstone (Edited by), Simmel on Culture: Selected Writings, London, Sage.
Simmel G. (1900/1978). The Philosophy of Money, London, Routledge.
Simmel G. (1903/1971). The Metropolis and Mental Life. In D. N. Levine (Edited by), Simmel: On Individuality and Social Forms. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Simmel G. (1907/1959). The Aesthetic Significance of the Face. In Georg Simmel, 1858-1918: A Collection of Essays. Ohio, Ohio State University Press.
Simmel G. (1907/1992). Exkurs über die Soziologie der Sinne. In Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.
Simmel G. (1908a/1992). Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.
Simmel G. (1908a/2009). Sociology: Inquiries into the Construction of Social Forms. Leida, Brill.
Simmel G. (1908b/1997). The Philosophy of Adornment. In D. Frisby and M. Featherstone (Edited by), Simmel on Culture: Selected Writings. London, Sage.
Simmel G. (1910/1949). The Sociology of Sociability. American Journal of Sociology, 55(3), 254-261.
Simmel G. (1913/1997). The Philosophy of Landscape. In D. Frisby and M. Featherstone (Edited by), Simmel on Culture: Selected Writings. London, Sage.
Simmel G. (1918/1997). The Conflict in Modern Culture. In D. Frisby and M. Featherstone (Edited by), Simmel on Culture: Selected Writings. London, Sage.
Slaby J. & von Scheve, C. (ed.) (2019). Affective Societies: Key Concepts. London, Routledge.
Thibaud J.-P. (2015). En quête d’ambiances. Éprouver la ville en passant. Genève MétisPresses.
Tiryakian E. A. (1995). Collective effervescence, social change and charisma: Durkheim, Weber and 1989. International Sociology, 10(3), 269-281.
Tocqueville A. de (1835-1840/2000). Democracy in America. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Tocqueville A. de (1856/1998-2001). The Old Regime and the Revolution. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Turner J. H. & Stets J. E. (2005). The Sociology of Emotions. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Uzarewicz M. (2011). Der Leib und die Grenzen der Gesellschaft. Eine neophänomenologische Soziologie des Transhumanen. Stuttgart, Lucius & Lucius.
Vannini P., Waskul D. & Gottschalk S. (2012). The Senses in Self, Society, and Culture: A Sociology of the Senses. London, Routledge.
Vozza M. (2002). I confini fluidi della reciprocità. Saggio su Simmel. Milano, Mimesis.
Weber M. (1919/1948). Science as a Vocation. In H. H. Gerth and C. W. Mills (Edited by), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (pp. 129-156). London, Routledge
Weber M. (1921/1958). The Rational and Social Foundations of Music. Southern Illinois University Press.
Weber M. (1922/1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.
Weber M. (1922/1963). The Sociology of Religion. Boston, Beacon Press.
Wolff K. H. (ed.) (1950). The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New York, Free Press.
Žižek S. (1989). The Sublime Object of Ideology. London, Verso.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
T
This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author retains the copyright to their contribution, while allowing anyone “to reproduce, distribute, communicate to the public, publicly display, perform, execute and recite the work”, provided that the author and the title of the journal are properly acknowledged.
At the time of submitting the publication proposal, the author is also required to declare that the content and structure of the work are original and do not in any way infringe upon the rights of third parties, nor the obligations related to the protection of the moral and economic rights of other authors or rights holders, whether concerning texts, images, photographs, tables, or any other parts of which the contribution may consist.
The author further declares that they are aware of the penalties provided for under the criminal code and special laws in the event of false statements in official documents and the use of false documents. Therefore, the journal shall be exempt from any liability of any kind, whether civil, administrative, or criminal, and the author shall hold the journal harmless from any request, claim, or demand made by third parties.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
