Reimagining the Secular Imaginary: A Theological Turn
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7413/228181381929Palabras clave:
Modernity, Gnosticism, Political Constitutions, Theology, the SacredResumen
In this paper, I interrogate some of the key assumptions of contemporary secularism in order demonstrate the presence of a concealed sacrality within the secular. My aim is to show that what philosophers and social theorists refer to as ‘secularity’ is simply a theological mutation within the Christian theological imaginary; one that we can, in its dis-incarnational rejection of the sacrality of nature in favour of grace, following Voeglin, position as ‘Gnostic’ (see Voegelin, 2012). In this vein, I will suggest that the sacred within the secular is fundamentally acosmic; residing beyond the realm of nature, which is now handed over to the dark fate of impersonal mechanism; as a series of causes within a larger order of causal necessity. In its radical separation of the sacred from the comsos, I will claim that the secular relocates the sacred within the infinitude of the subject; within a realm of radical freedom, where the self no longer has any spiritual communion with things but only with other selves to the extent that politics itself takes on a spiritual dimension (see Jonas, 2001). In making this claim, I will endeavour to show what, at first glance, appears to be the waning of sacrality of modern contexts, in reality is simply an effect of a hard-to-discern transformation: from a conception of sacrality primarily located in the outer realms of people and things, to one found in the relative immateriality of political discourse - from ‘the invisible in natural things’ to ‘the visible in political words’.My approach is deliberately and self-consciously ‘theoretical’. In the present era, when various forms of bland empiricism and the ideology of scientism blind us to any need for new ideas and alternative ways of imagining the social-historical, it is essential that work in the Humanities again begins to move along critical and speculative paths. For ‘facts without theories are blind’ – and it is only the vision of the theorist that is able to transform the crises of our age into something thought-worthy and, ultimately, to render our responses choice-worthy. In so doing, I willmake the theory-driven claim that in the passage to modernity the sacred was
sublimated into a new form: abstracted and further esoterisised as it was uprooted from its cosmological groundings and rearticulated into the modern imaginaries of politics and law. My key claim will be that within modern contexts the ‘sacrality of the secular’ ultimately resides within a new type of political textuality – in the idea of a sacred constitution that manifests itself in the utopian recognition and obligation of a people with/to itself and to all other peoples. In other words, I will suggest that in modern contexts, the sacred becomes disembedded within the futurity of political symbolic orders and is therefore neither diminished nor diluted but simply relocated and rearticulated within founding political texts – texts that possess quite specific ontological, world-transforming, effects. In this way, I claim that within secular modernity the sacred emerges as a geo-political ideal of universal freedom that presents itself as necessary a priori political truth that applies universally to all peoples, all places, and for all time. It is in this sense that the modern sacred retains its link with the eschaton via its implicit connection to the ideal of an end of history, the time when the moral and political obligations of the founding political text will be fulfilled and realised for all peoples. By way of conclusion, I will suggest that recognition of this requires a new ‘theological turn’ in contemporary Philosophy and Social Theory.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
T
This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author retains the copyright to their contribution, while allowing anyone “to reproduce, distribute, communicate to the public, publicly display, perform, execute and recite the work”, provided that the author and the title of the journal are properly acknowledged.
At the time of submitting the publication proposal, the author is also required to declare that the content and structure of the work are original and do not in any way infringe upon the rights of third parties, nor the obligations related to the protection of the moral and economic rights of other authors or rights holders, whether concerning texts, images, photographs, tables, or any other parts of which the contribution may consist.
The author further declares that they are aware of the penalties provided for under the criminal code and special laws in the event of false statements in official documents and the use of false documents. Therefore, the journal shall be exempt from any liability of any kind, whether civil, administrative, or criminal, and the author shall hold the journal harmless from any request, claim, or demand made by third parties.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


